Literature DB >> 12916022

Sample size calculations for population- and family-based case-control association studies on marker genotypes.

Ruth M Pfeiffer1, Mitchell H Gail.   

Abstract

Most previous sample size calculations for case-control studies to detect genetic associations with disease assumed that the disease gene locus is known, whereas, in fact, markers are used. We calculated sample sizes for unmatched case-control and sibling case-control studies to detect an association between a biallelic marker and a disease governed by a putative biallelic disease locus. Required sample sizes increase with increasing discrepancy between the marker and disease allele frequencies, and with less-than-maximal linkage disequilibrium between the marker and disease alleles. Qualitatively similar results were found for studies of parent offspring triads based on the transmission disequilibrium test (Abel and Müller-Myhsok, 1998, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:664-667; Tu and Whittemore, 1999, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64:641-649). We also studied other factors affecting required sample size, including attributable risk for the disease allele, inheritance mechanism, disease prevalence, and for sibling case-control designs, extragenetic familial aggregation of disease and recombination. The large sample-size requirements represent a formidable challenge to studies of this type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12916022     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  14 in total

1.  Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zeynep Kalaylioglu; Roxana Moslehi; Ulrike Peters; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Using linkage genome scans to improve power of association in genome scans.

Authors:  Kathryn Roeder; Silvi-Alin Bacanu; Larry Wasserman; B Devlin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Probability that a two-stage genome-wide association study will detect a disease-associated snp and implications for multistage designs.

Authors:  M H Gail; R M Pfeiffer; W Wheeler; D Pee
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  The association between genetic polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinases and caries experience.

Authors:  Funda Çağırır Dindaroğlu; Nesrin Eronat; Asude Durmaz; Dilşah Çoğulu; Burak Durmaz; Özgür Çoğulu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  BAYESIAN SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR TWO-PHASE STUDIES OF GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION.

Authors:  Jaeil Ahn; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stephen B Gruber; Malay Ghosh
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Robust tests for single-marker analysis in case-control genetic association studies.

Authors:  Qizhai Li; Gang Zheng; Xueying Liang; Kai Yu
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Testing for linkage and association across the dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase gene region with Alzheimer's disease in three sample populations.

Authors:  Abraham M Brown; Derek Gordon; Hsinhwa Lee; Fabienne Wavrant-De Vrièze; Elena Cellini; Silvia Bagnoli; Benedetta Nacmias; Sandro Sorbi; John Hardy; John P Blass
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  In Vitro Assessment of the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cell Line SUM 149: Discovery of 2 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the RNase L Gene.

Authors:  Brandon T Nokes; Heather E Cunliffe; Bonnie Lafleur; David W Mount; Robert B Livingston; Bernard W Futscher; Julie E Lang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 10.  Mendelian randomization: how it can--and cannot--help confirm causal relations between nutrition and cancer.

Authors:  Arthur Schatzkin; Christian C Abnet; Amanda J Cross; Marc Gunter; Ruth Pfeiffer; Mitchell Gail; Unhee Lim; George Davey-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.