Literature DB >> 12909695

Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients.

Douglas L Altshuler1, Robert Dudley.   

Abstract

Hovering flight is one of the most energetically demanding forms of animal locomotion. Despite the cost, hummingbirds regularly hover at high elevations, where flight is doubly challenging because of reduced air density and oxygen availability. We performed three laboratory experiments to examine how air density and oxygen partial pressure influence wingbeat kinematics. In the first study, we experimentally lowered air density but maintained constant oxygen partial pressure. Under these hypodense but normoxic conditions, hummingbirds increased stroke amplitude substantially and increased wingbeat frequency slightly. In the second experiment, we maintained constant air density but decreased oxygen partial pressure. Under these normodense but hypoxic conditions, hummingbirds did not alter stroke amplitude but instead reduced wingbeat frequency until they could no longer generate enough vertical force to offset body weight. In a final combined experiment, we decreased air density but increased oxygen availability, and found that the wingbeat kinematics were unaffected by supplemental oxygen. We also studied hovering and maximally loaded flight performance for 43 hummingbird species distributed along a natural elevational gradient in Peru. During free hovering flight, hummingbirds showed increased stroke amplitude interspecifically at higher elevations, mirroring the intra-individual responses in our first laboratory experiment. During loaded flight, hummingbirds increased both wingbeat frequency and wing stroke amplitude by 19% relative to free-flight values at any given elevation. We conclude that modulation of wing stroke amplitude is a major compensatory mechanism for flight in hypodense or hypobaric environments. By contrast, increases in wingbeat frequency impose substantial metabolic demands, are only elicited transiently and anaerobically, and cannot be used to generate additional sustained lift at high elevations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909695     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  21 in total

1.  Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Kenneth C Welch; Brian H Cho; Danny B Welch; Amy F Lin; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.

Authors:  D L Altshuler; R Dudley; S M Heredia; J A McGuire
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

8.  Integrating morphology and kinematics in the scaling of hummingbird hovering metabolic rate and efficiency.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Donald R Powers; Bret W Tobalske; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Phylogenetic and kinematic constraints on avian flight signals.

Authors:  K S Berg; S Delgado; A Mata-Betancourt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.