Literature DB >> 12909224

Long-term outcome of phase II trial evaluating chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

Stephen G Swisher1, Jaffer A Ajani, Ritsuko Komaki, Jonathan C Nesbitt, Arlene M Correa, James D Cox, Sandeep Lahoti, Faye Martin, Joe B Putnam, W Roy Smythe, Ara A Vaporciyan, Garrett L Walsh, Jack A Roth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer were entered into a Phase II study between November 1996 and October 1998 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patients initially received two cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), followed by chemoradiotherapy, consisting of radiation (45 Gy during 5 weeks) with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/d during radiation) and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days). Surgical resection was performed 4-6 weeks after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 32; 84%). Pretreatment endoscopic ultrasonography revealed T3 tumors in 33 patients (87%) and N1 disease in 25 patients (66%). Thirty-seven patients (97%) completed the planned chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and 35 patients (92%) underwent surgery, with a 30-day mortality rate of 6% (2 of 35 patients). A pathologic complete response or microscopic residual carcinoma (<10% viable) was found in 25 (71%) of 35 patients and was associated with a disease-free survival rate of 72% at 3 years and 51% at 5 years. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis and a median potential follow-up of 58 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rate for all 38 patients was 63% and 39%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study suggest that the strategy of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery is safe and warrants further evaluation in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909224     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00522-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Influence of hemoglobin levels on survival after radical treatment of esophageal carcinoma with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Javier Valencia Julve; Vicente Alonso Orduña; Ricardo Escó Barón; Miriam López-Mata; Agustina Méndez Villamón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Pathologic complete response may not represent the optimal surrogate for survival after preoperative therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A William Blackstock; Mabea Aklilu; James Lovato; Michael R Farmer; Girish Mishra; Susan A Melin; Timothy Oaks; Kim Geisinger; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2006

3.  Three cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer successfully treated with chemoradiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Masashi Taguchi; Yoshikuni Nagashio; Yasuyuki Kihara; Masaaki Hiura; Shintaro Abe; Mitsuyoshi Yamamoto; Masaru Harada
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-05

4.  Long-term outcome of a phase II study of docetaxel-based multimodality chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Nicholas W Choong; Ann M Mauer; Daniel C Haraf; Mark K Ferguson; Alan B Sandler; Kenneth A Kesler; Paul A S Fishkin; Rafat H Ansari; James Wade; Stuart A Krauss; David F Sciortino; Mitchell C Posner; Masha Kocherginsky; Philip C Hoffman; Livia Szeto; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Predictive factors in the evaluation of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Claudia Wong; Simon Law
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT).

Authors:  Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Tsung T Wu; Arlene M Correa; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko R Komaki; Lucian Chirieac; Kelly K Hunt; Zhongxing Liao; Alexandria Phan; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor.

Authors:  Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; Kwok Wah Chan; Alfred King Yin Lam; Kam Ho Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  John Vincent Reynolds; Cian Muldoon; Donal Hollywood; Narayanasamy Ravi; Suzanne Rowley; Ken O'Byrne; John Kennedy; Thomas J Murphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Trimodality therapy for stage II-III carcinoma of the esophagus: a dose-ranging study of concurrent capecitabine, docetaxel, and thoracic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew D Wood; Bassem I Zaki; Stuart R Gordon; John E Sutton; Mikhail Lisovsky; Jiang Gui; Jeffrey A Bubis; Konstantin H Dragnev; James R Rigas
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.