OBJECTIVE: We present and analyze long-term outcomes following multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer, in particular the relative impact of histomorphologic tumor regression and nodal status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients [(adenocarcinoma (n = 170) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 73)] treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the period 1990 to 2004 were followed prospectively with a median follow-up of 60 months. Pathologic stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) were documented, the site of first failure was recorded, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. RESULTS: Thirty patients (12%) did not undergo surgery due to disease progression or deteriorated performance status. Forty-one patients (19%) had a complete pathologic response (pCR), and there were 31(15%) stage I, 69 (32%) stage II, and 72 (34%) stage III cases. The overall median survival was 18 months, and the 5-year survival was 27%. The 5-year survival of patients achieving a pCR was 50% compared with 37% in non-pCR patients who were node-negative (P = 0.86). Histomorphologic tumor regression was not associated with pre-CRT cTN stage but was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with ypN stage. By multivariate analysis, ypN status (P = 0.002) was more predictive of overall survival than TRG (P = 0.06) or ypT stage (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Achieving a node-negative status is the major determinant of outcome following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Histomorphologic tumor regression is less predictive of outcome than pathologic nodal status (ypN), and the need to include a primary site regression score in a new staging classification is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: We present and analyze long-term outcomes following multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer, in particular the relative impact of histomorphologic tumor regression and nodal status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients [(adenocarcinoma (n = 170) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 73)] treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the period 1990 to 2004 were followed prospectively with a median follow-up of 60 months. Pathologic stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) were documented, the site of first failure was recorded, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. RESULTS: Thirty patients (12%) did not undergo surgery due to disease progression or deteriorated performance status. Forty-one patients (19%) had a complete pathologic response (pCR), and there were 31(15%) stage I, 69 (32%) stage II, and 72 (34%) stage III cases. The overall median survival was 18 months, and the 5-year survival was 27%. The 5-year survival of patients achieving a pCR was 50% compared with 37% in non-pCR patients who were node-negative (P = 0.86). Histomorphologic tumor regression was not associated with pre-CRT cTN stage but was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with ypN stage. By multivariate analysis, ypN status (P = 0.002) was more predictive of overall survival than TRG (P = 0.06) or ypT stage (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Achieving a node-negative status is the major determinant of outcome following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Histomorphologic tumor regression is less predictive of outcome than pathologic nodal status (ypN), and the need to include a primary site regression score in a new staging classification is unclear.
Authors: Jessica S Donington; Daniel L Miller; Mark S Allen; Claude Deschamps; Francis C Nichols; Peter C Pairolero Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mohamed M M Abdel-Latif; James O'Riordan; Henry J Windle; Eleanor Carton; Nagunivan Ravi; Dermot Kelleher; John V Reynolds Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Gail R Walker; Kristian Ferry; Dido Franceschi; Alan S Livingstone Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko Komaki; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Arlene M Correa; James D Cox; Sandeep Lahoti; Faye Martin; Joe B Putnam; W Roy Smythe; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Orla Mc Cormack; Marie Timlin; Anne Mc Gowan; Marie-Louise Healy; Narayanasamy Ravi; John V Reynolds Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: N J O'Farrell; J V Reynolds; N Ravi; J O Larkin; V Malik; G F Wilson; C Muldoon; D O'Toole Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2012-12-16 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; Kwok Wah Chan; Alfred King Yin Lam; Kam Ho Wong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Robert A Meguid; Craig M Hooker; Joshua T Taylor; Laurence R Kleinberg; Stephen M Cattaneo; Marc S Sussman; Stephen C Yang; Richard F Heitmiller; Arlene A Forastiere; Malcolm V Brock Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: M Byrne; J V Reynolds; J S O'Donnell; M Keogan; B White; M Byrne; S Murphy; S G Maher; G P Pidgeon Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.640