Literature DB >> 30944954

Factors affecting willingness to get assessed and treated for osteoporosis.

Y H Roh1, E S Lee2, J Ahn3, H S Kim4, H S Gong5, K H Baek6, H Y Chung7.   

Abstract

Individuals with poor knowledge of osteoporosis and lower socioeconomic status, including being single and having a lower level of annual income, are less likely to be assessed or treated for osteoporosis. Individuals with particular osteoporosis risk factors such as smokers and heavy drinkers are overlooked for diagnosis. Further study is needed to identify and address the existing barriers and to promote osteoporosis management for women with these risk factors.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the negative health consequences of osteoporosis and the availability of effective treatment, a pervasive and persistent prevention care gap for osteoporosis remains present throughout the world. We attempted to identify the factors affecting the willingness of patients to either undergo or avoid assessment and treatment for osteoporosis.
METHODS: A nationwide online survey was conducted in 926 Korean women over age 50. The survey included questions addressing three domains: (1) clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, (2) questions concerning the reasons for undergoing or avoiding osteoporosis assessment or treatment, and (3) knowledge of osteoporosis as measured using the modified Korean version of Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz. The assessed and non-assessed participants were compared in terms of their clinical and socioeconomic statuses, reasons for undergoing or avoiding osteoporosis management, and levels of knowledge of osteoporosis.
RESULTS: The highest-ranked reason for undergoing osteoporosis assessment was fear of osteoporotic fracture, while the highest-ranked reason for avoiding osteoporosis assessment was not feeling a need to get tested for osteoporosis. Participants who sought assessment for osteoporosis were older and more likely to be married, and had greater knowledge of osteoporosis than those who did not seek assessment. The two groups were found to be similar in terms of tobacco use and daily alcohol use. Patients who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis but either did not initiate or discontinued osteoporosis treatment within 1 year were younger and had lower levels of annual income than those who began and continued treatment.
CONCLUSION: Individuals with poor knowledge of osteoporosis and those of lower socioeconomic status, including those who were single and had a lower level of annual income, were less likely to be assessed and treated for osteoporosis. Individuals with particular osteoporosis risk factors such as smokers and heavy drinkers are overlooked for diagnosis. Further study is needed to identify and address the existing barriers and to promote osteoporosis management for women with these risk factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Knowledge on osteoporosis; Osteoporosis; Risk factors; Socio-demographic characteristics; Treatment; Willingness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30944954     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04952-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Lifetime risks of hip, Colles', or vertebral fracture and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; S M Rubin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-11

2.  Factors associated with the treatment of osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Young-Jee Jeon; Ji Wan Kim; Joo-Sung Park
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2014

3.  Knowledge on osteoporosis in guardians of hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Baek; Young-Kyun Lee; Seok-Woo Hong; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Colles fracture, spine fracture, and subsequent risk of hip fracture in men and women. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Philippe Autier; John Collins; Brigitte Velkeniers; Dirk Vanderschueren; Steven Boonen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  J D Adachi; G Ioannidis; L Pickard; C Berger; J C Prior; L Joseph; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T M Murray; T Anastassiades; W Hopman; J P Brown; S Kirkland; C Joyce; A Papaioannou; S Poliquin; A Tenenhouse; E A Papadimitropoulos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  How people decide to seek health care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  C Shaw; K Brittain; R Tansey; K Williams
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  Revision of the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz.

Authors:  Rita L Ailinger; Howard Lasus; Mary Ann Braun
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Factors associated with treatment of women with osteoporosis or osteopenia from a national survey.

Authors:  Eric S Meadows; Beth D Mitchell; Susan C Bolge; Joseph A Johnston; Nananda F Col
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Knowledge on Osteoporosis among Nurses.

Authors:  Chan-Ho Park; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-31

Review 10.  The osteoporosis care gap in Canada.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; L Giangregorio; B Kvern; P Boulos; G Ioannidis; J D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Osteoporosis is under recognized and undertreated in adult spinal deformity patients.

Authors:  Anmol Gupta; Thomas Cha; Joseph Schwab; Harold Fogel; Daniel G Tobert; Afshin E Razi; Carl Paulino; Andrew C Hecht; Christopher M Bono; Stuart Hershman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women.

Authors:  L Iconaru; C Smeys; F Baleanu; V Kinnard; M Moreau; S Cappelle; M Surquin; M Rubinstein; S Rozenberg; M Paesmans; R Karmali; P Bergmann; J J Body
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  What factors affect the methodological and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines for osteoporosis? Protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Peng-Zhong Fang; Ya-Min Chen; Jin-Lei Chen; Jun-Hao Sun; Jian-Shi Tan; Rui-Rui Wang; Xin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.