Literature DB >> 12898176

Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.

Botond K Szabó1, Peter Aspelin, Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg, Tibor Tot, Beata Boné.   

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory study was to correlate kinetic and morphologic MR features with histologic prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer. Sixty-one women with invasive breast cancer underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T, using T1-weighted 3D fast low-angle shot technique. The MR characteristics were correlated with classical pathologic prognostic factors (tumor size, histologic type, grade and lymph node status) and immunohistochemically detected biomarkers [c-erbB-2, p53, Ki-67, and estrogen receptor (ER)]. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. Presence of rim enhancement pattern, early maximal enhancement and washout phenomenon were independently associated with established predictors of poor prognosis (higher histologic grade, positive Ki-67, and negative ER status). Our results suggest that these MR signs are not only important in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, but may also be useful to noninvasively identify highly aggressive breast carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898176     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2000-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  51 in total

1.  Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Hrung; S S Sonnad; J S Schwartz; C P Langlotz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Tumour angiogenesis and prognosis.

Authors:  S B Fox
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.

Authors:  H Sherif; A E Mahfouz; H Oellinger; J Hadijuana; J U Blohmer; M Taupitz; R Felix; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Gasparini
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2000

6.  Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI.

Authors:  D L Buckley; P J Drew; S Mussurakis; J R Monson; A Horsman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors.

Authors:  M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  I Jatoi; S G Hilsenbeck; G M Clark; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.

Authors:  S Mussurakis; D L Buckley; P J Drew; J N Fox; P J Carleton; L W Turnbull; A Horsman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Assessment of angiogenesis in breast carcinoma: an important factor in prognosis?

Authors:  H Goulding; N F Abdul Rashid; J F Robertson; J A Bell; C W Elston; R W Blamey; I O Ellis
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  46 in total

1.  Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  D Lin; L Moy; D Axelrod; J Smith
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Giovanni De Rosa; Stefano Cirillo; Vincenzo Marra; Nicoletta Biglia; Marco Gatti; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors:  Kathinka D Kurz; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Reinhart Willers; Dirk Blondin; Ulrich Mödder; Andreas Saleh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) predict tumor recurrence and lymph node status in patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  S Bahri; J-H Chen; H J Yu; A Kuzucan; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  The role of radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing early breast cancer: the pathologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tibor Tot; László Tabár
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Fischer's score criteria correlating with histopathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; M Tonegutti; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Estrogen receptor and breast MR imaging features: a correlation study.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Hyeon-Man Baek; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors.

Authors:  Paolo Belli; Melania Costantini; Enida Bufi; Giuseppe Giovanni Giardina; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Gianluca Franceschini; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shin Ho Lee; Nariya Cho; Seung Ja Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Kyung Soo Cho; Eun Sook Ko; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with a second-generation US contrast medium in a rat breast tumor model.

Authors:  Eun Young Ko; Sang Hoon Lee; Hak Hee Kim; Sung Moon Kim; Myung Jin Shin; Namkug Kim; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.