Literature DB >> 12898087

End posture selection in manual positioning: evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method.

Catherine L Elsinger1, David A Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

Although it is well known that the postures adopted at the ends of movements depend on where one starts and how one moves, it is not yet clear whether those differing end postures are selected before movements begin. Two experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that end postures for positioning movements are chosen before movements commence. The experiments were further designed to check whether movements are internally simulated before overt movements occur and end-postures are still being selected. To address these questions we used a movement choice method. Participants were presented with two possible end postures and were asked to choose between them by moving to the one that seemed easier to adopt. End-posture choices were affected by starting positions and also by the movements that would have to be made, as affected by having obstacles in the way. The results suggest that participants relied on feedforward modeling of prospective movements as they selected end postures prior to overt movement production. The fact that the movement choice method could confirm this suggests that the method holds considerable promise as a tool for investigating motor planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898087     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1573-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Planning reaching and grasping movements: the problem of obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  J Vaughan; D A Rosenbaum; R G Meulenbroek
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 2.  Planning reaching and grasping movements: theoretical premises and practical implications.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; R G Meulenbroek; J Vaughan
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion.

Authors:  A Sirigu; E Daprati; P Pradat-Diehl; N Franck; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Mechanisms of control in motor performance: closed-loop versus motor programming control.

Authors:  E A Roy; R G Marteniuk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-11

6.  Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour.

Authors:  R G Meulenbroek; D A Rosenbaum; A J Thomassen; L R Schomaker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1993-05

7.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J R Duhamel; L Cohen; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape.

Authors:  Raymond H Cuijpers; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Marcel Mutsaarts; Bert Steenbergen; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Yupeng Xiao; Sujin Kim; Toshinori Yoshioka; James Gordon; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp: a pilot study.

Authors:  Caroline Tan; Jarugool Tretriluxana; Erica Pitsch; Nuttakarn Runnarong; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Comparative investigations of manual action representations: evidence that chimpanzees represent the costs of potential future actions involving tools.

Authors:  Scott H Frey; Daniel J Povinelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.

Authors:  Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points?

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Eli Brenner; Willemijn D Schot; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.