Literature DB >> 33860822

Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.

Ryan W Langridge1, Jonathan J Marotta2.   

Abstract

The visuomotor processes involved in grasping a 2-D target are known to be fundamentally different than those involved in grasping a 3-D object, and this has led to concerns regarding the generalizability of 2-D grasping research. This study directly compared participants' fixation positions and digit placement during interaction with either physical square objects or 2-D virtual versions of these objects. Participants were instructed to either simply grasp the stimulus or grasp and slide it to another location. Participants' digit placement and fixation positions did not significantly differ as a function of stimulus type when grasping in the center of the display. However, gaze and grasp positions shifted toward the near side of non-central virtual stimuli, while consistently remaining close to the horizontal midline of the physical stimulus. Participants placed their digits at less stable locations when grasping the virtual stimulus in comparison to the physical stimulus on the right side of the display, but this difference disappeared when grasping in the center and on the left. Similar outward shifts in digit placement and lowered fixations were observed when sliding both stimulus types, suggesting participants incorporated similar adjustments in grasp selection in anticipation of manipulation in both Physical and Virtual stimulus conditions. These results suggest that while fixation position and grasp point selection differed between stimulus type as a function of stimulus position, certain eye-hand coordinated behaviours were maintained when grasping both physical and virtual stimuli.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye-hand coordination; Grasp axis; Grasp point selection; Virtual 2-D stimuli

Year:  2021        PMID: 33860822     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06101-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics.

Authors:  Raymond H Cuijpers; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  "Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Getting a grip on reality: Grasping movements directed to real objects and images rely on dissociable neural representations.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Scott N Macdonald; Juan Chen; Derek J Quinlan; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping.

Authors:  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference.

Authors:  G P Bingham; M M Muchisky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

7.  Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream.

Authors:  L L Chao; A Martin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  End posture selection in manual positioning: evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method.

Authors:  Catherine L Elsinger; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.