Literature DB >> 10506089

Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion.

A Sirigu1, E Daprati, P Pradat-Diehl, N Franck, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

Three apraxic patients with lesions in the left parietal cortex were required to execute finger movements with either hand, while the visual feedback they received about the movement was manipulated systematically. We used a device which allowed us to present on a video monitor either the patient's hand or the examiner's hand simultaneously performing an identical or a different movement. In each trial, patients were required to decide whether the hand shown on the screen was their own or not. Hand movements produced in response to verbal command included simple (single-finger extension) and complex gestures (multi-finger extension). Ownership judgements were analysed and compared with those produced by six normal controls and two non-apraxic neurological patients. Apraxic patients and controls accurately recognized their own hand on the screen (own movement condition) and correctly identified the viewed hand as the examiner's when it performed a movement different from their own movement (incongruent movement condition). However, when the viewed hand was the examiner's hand executing their own movement (congruent movement condition), apraxic patients were significantly more impaired than controls. When the results were analysed as a function of gesture type, the number of correct responses was significantly lower for apraxic patients with respect to controls only for complex gestures. Interestingly, when patients executed the finger gestures inaccurately, they still failed to recognize the examiner's hand as alien, and claimed that the correct movement presented on the screen was their own. These results confirm that parietal lesions alter the representational aspects of gestures, and suggest a failure in evaluating and comparing internal and external feedback about movement. We conclude that the parietal cortex plays an important role in generating and maintaining a kinaesthetic model of ongoing movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506089     DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  57 in total

Review 1.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action.

Authors:  C D Frith; S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ventral and dorsal fiber systems for imagined and executed movement.

Authors:  Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Dorothee Saur; Michel Rijntjes; Roza Umarova; Philipp Kellmeyer; Susanne Schnell; Volkmar Glauche; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The neural processes underlying self-agency.

Authors:  Fatta B Nahab; Prantik Kundu; Cecile Gallea; John Kakareka; Randy Pursley; Tom Pohida; Nathaniel Miletta; Jason Friedman; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency.

Authors:  James W Moore; Diane Ruge; Dorit Wenke; John Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Review of motor and phantom-related imagery.

Authors:  William S Anderson; Frederick A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions.

Authors:  Elena Daprati; Selina Wriessnegger; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The embodied nature of motor imagery: the influence of posture and perspective.

Authors:  Britta Lorey; Matthias Bischoff; Sebastian Pilgramm; Rudolf Stark; Jörn Munzert; Karen Zentgraf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Involvement of the intrinsic/default system in movement-related self recognition.

Authors:  Roy Salomon; Rafael Malach; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.