Literature DB >> 8316638

Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour.

R G Meulenbroek1, D A Rosenbaum, A J Thomassen, L R Schomaker.   

Abstract

How do we select combinations of limb segments to carry out physical tasks? Three possible determinants of limb-segment selection are hypothesized here: (1) optimal amplitudes and frequencies of motion for the effectors; (2) preferred movement axes for the effectors; and (3) a tendency to continue using already-recruited limb-segments. We tested these factors in a graphic production task. Seven subjects produced back-and-forth drawing movements of gradually changing amplitude. The largest amplitude to be covered, trial duration, movement axis, and direction of amplitude change (from small to large or vice versa) were varied between trials. Selspot recordings were used to study the relative contributions of the fingers, hand, and arm to displacements of the pen. The temporal order of limb-segment involvement was also studied. The results confirmed the predicted effects of the three limb-segment selection factors. We conclude that limb-segment coordination is adaptively related to biomechanical features of the motor system and to the computational demands of movement selection itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8316638     DOI: 10.1080/14640749308401047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  11 in total

Review 1.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Gary E Gibson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Cooperative selection of movements: the optimal selection model.

Authors:  J Vaughan; D A Rosenbaum; F J Diedrich; C M Moore
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

4.  Adaptation of a reaching model to handwriting: how different effectors can produce the same written output, and other results.

Authors:  R G Meulenbroek; D A Rosenbaum; A J Thomassen; L D Loukopoulos; J Vaughan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

5.  Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Matthias Weigelt; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  End posture selection in manual positioning: evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method.

Authors:  Catherine L Elsinger; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinct Inter-Joint Coordination during Fast Alternate Keystrokes in Pianists with Superior Skill.

Authors:  Shinichi Furuya; Tatsushi Goda; Haruhiro Katayose; Hiroyoshi Miwa; Noriko Nagata
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Thomas Schack; Jan Westerholz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-22

10.  Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.