Literature DB >> 12893342

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--an analysis of factors affecting operating time.

Ahmed El-Feel1, John W Davis, Serdar Deger, Jan Roigas, Andreas H Wille, Dietmar Schnorr, Stefan Loening, Amr Abdel Hakiem, Ingolf A Tuerk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is accomplished within 2 to 3 hours by experienced surgeons, less is known about the operating times (OTs) for recently trained surgeons or the influence of additional factors. As of November 2001 at our institution, two senior surgeons had each performed more than 100 cases of LRP and two junior surgeons had each performed fewer than 30. We prospectively studied the next 100 consecutive LRPs to assess the factors influencing the OT.
METHODS: Transperitoneal LRPs were performed by two senior (n = 62) and two junior surgeons (n = 38) with random case assignment. We assessed body mass index, prostate size, prior abdominal surgery, androgen deprivation, surgeon experience, procedures in addition to LRP, lymph node dissection, nerve sparing, and sural nerve grafting as potential predictors of the OT.
RESULTS: Prostate weight, androgen deprivation, and prior abdominal surgery did not significantly affect the OT, but grade 1 obesity increased the OT by an average of 38 minutes. The mean OT by surgeon experience was 214 minutes for seniors and 347 minutes for juniors (P <0.001). By procedure type, the OT ranged from 180 minutes for LRP only by seniors to 459 minutes for LRP plus lymph node dissection plus sural nerve grafting by juniors. Lymph node dissection and sural nerve grafting significantly increased the OT by 46 and 101 minutes, respectively, and nerve sparing did not. For each combination of procedures, seniors averaged significantly shorter times than did juniors. A multiple regression model with stepwise selection showed that prostate weight, sural nerve grafting, pelvic lymph node dissection, use of a surgical robot, and surgeon experience significantly affected the OT.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study of 100 cases of LRP showed that the OT for senior surgeons averaged 2 to 3 hours, but less experienced surgeons, and additional procedures, add significantly to the OT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12893342     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00250-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  14 in total

1.  Factors predicting prolonged operative time for individual surgical steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): A single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Abdullah M Alenizi; Roger Valdivieso; Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Cristian Toarta; Marc Bienz; Mounsif Azizi; Pierre Alain Hueber; Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Vincent Trudeau; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [Clinical pathway "laparoscopic prostatectomy". Analysis of anesthesiological procedures in a randomized study].

Authors:  J-P Braun; M Walter; M Lein; J Roigas; B Schwilk; M Moshirzadeh; K Eveslage; B Rehberg-Klug; D Hansen; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi-Long Wu; Huai-Peng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients: feasible or foolhardy?

Authors:  Richard E Link
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

5.  Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Yoshio Ohno; Jun Nakashima; Kenji Shimodaira; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tatsuo Gondo; Makoto Ohori; Masaaki Tachibana; Kunihiko Yoshioka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Erik P Castle; Fatih Atug; Michael Woods; Raju Thomas; Rodney Davis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Impact of obesity on functional and oncological outcomes in radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Altay; Bulent Erkurt; Vahit Guzelburc; Murat Can Kiremit; Mustafa Yucel Boz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in morbidly obese patients: how to create a cost-effective adequate optical trocar.

Authors:  Andrea Cestari; Mattia Sangalli; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Massimo Lazzeri; Alessandro Larcher; Emanuele Scapaticci; Giovanni Lughezzani; Fabio Fabbri; Patrizio Rigatti; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-03-08

9.  Factors affecting the outcome of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pelvic arch interference and depth of the pelvic cavity.

Authors:  Deok-Hyun Nam; Eu Chang Hwang; Chang Min Im; Sun-Ouck Kim; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Soo Bang Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-01-24

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Jennifer Yates; Ravi Munver; Ihor Sawczuk
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2010-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.