Literature DB >> 26279709

Factors predicting prolonged operative time for individual surgical steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): A single surgeon's experience.

Abdullah M Alenizi1, Roger Valdivieso2, Emad Rajih1, Malek Meskawi2, Cristian Toarta2, Marc Bienz2, Mounsif Azizi2, Pierre Alain Hueber2, Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin2, Vincent Trudeau2, Quoc-Dien Trinh3, Assaad El-Hakim4, Kevin C Zorn2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the average time required to complete individual steps of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by an expert RARP surgeon. The intent is to help establish a time-based benchmark to aim for during apprenticeship. In addition, we aimed to evaluate preoperative patient factors, which could prolong the operative time of these individual steps.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 247 patients who underwent RARP, performed by an experienced robotic surgeon at our institution. Baseline patient characteristics and the duration of each step were recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed to predict factors of prolonged individual steps.
RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, obesity was a significant predictor of prolonged operative time of: docking (odds ratio [OR] 1.96), urethral division (OR 3.13), and vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) (OR 2.63). Prostate volume was also a significant predictor of longer operative time in dorsal vein complex ligation (OR 1.02), bladder neck division (OR 1.03), pedicle control (OR 1.04), urethral division (OR 1.02), and VUA (OR 1.03). A prolonged bladder neck division was predicted by the presence of a median lobe (OR 5.03). Only obesity (OR 2.56) and prostate volume (OR 1.04) were predictors of a longer overall operative time.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and prostate volume are powerful predictors of longer overall operative time. Furthermore, both can predict prolonged time of several individual RARP steps. The presence of a median lobe is a strong predictor of a longer bladder neck division. These factors should be taken into consideration during RARP training.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279709      PMCID: PMC4514485          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--an analysis of factors affecting operating time.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Feel; John W Davis; Serdar Deger; Jan Roigas; Andreas H Wille; Dietmar Schnorr; Stefan Loening; Amr Abdel Hakiem; Ingolf A Tuerk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; David W Goldfarb; James C Sander; Brian J Miles; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Anders Bjartell; Vincenzo Ficarra; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Rodolfo Montironi; Francesco Montorsi; Judd W Moul; Giacomo Novara; Guido Sauter; Tullio Sulser; Henk van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: how I do it. Part I: Patient preparation and positioning.

Authors:  Roger F Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.344

5.  The rapid uptake of robotic prostatectomy and its collateral effects.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Cognitive training and assessment in robotic surgery - is it effective?

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes of the first robotic prostatectomy program in Quebec: Single fellowship-trained surgeon's experience of 250 cases.

Authors:  Naif Al-Hathal; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized?

Authors:  John W Davis; Ashish Kamat; Mark Munsell; Curtis Pettaway; Louis Pisters; Surena Matin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Kellogg Parsons; J Lisette Bennett
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Standardized 4-step technique of bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Emad Rajih; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.