Literature DB >> 16075255

[Clinical pathway "laparoscopic prostatectomy". Analysis of anesthesiological procedures in a randomized study].

J-P Braun1, M Walter, M Lein, J Roigas, B Schwilk, M Moshirzadeh, K Eveslage, B Rehberg-Klug, D Hansen, C Spies.   

Abstract

METHODS: In this study we investigated the anesthesiological module of a clinical pathway. We chose the pathway of "laparoscopic prostatectomy" as an example for time-consuming minimally invasive surgery and 40 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups receiving either total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/ remifentanil or balanced minimal flow anesthesia using desflurane/ remifentanil. During this module the indicators of quality such as vigilance, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and mobilization were measured. Costs were evaluated and analyzed by a bottom-up procedure.
RESULTS: There were no anesthesia-related deviations from clinical pathways and both forms of anesthesia management were equally well tolerated by the patients. No significant difference was observed regarding hemodynamic measurements or PONV. The patients in the desflurane/ remifentanil group recovered more rapidly (p=0.037) and had more pain. The amount of analgesic agents given immediately following anesthesia was significantly higher than in the TIVA group (p=0.017). The median anesthesia costs per minute for laparoscopic prostatectomy in the propofol group were 2.79 EUR (minimum cost 2.41 EUR, maximum cost 3.21 EUR) and in the desflurane group 2.68 EUR (minimum cost 2.45 EUR, maximum cost 3.39 EUR). The total anesthesia costs for both groups were within the proceeds matrix range for diagnosis-related groups (DRG). However, the cost analysis for medication was slightly higher than the proceeds matrix range for DRGs.
CONCLUSION: Both forms of anesthesia can be implemented for time-consuming surgical procedures and allow a cost-effective anesthesia management. Anesthesiological procedures must go hand-in-hand with the type of anesthesia selected. The prophylactic use of analgetics for desflurane/ remifentanil anesthesia should be given earlier and in higher doses than in propofol/ remifentanil anesthesia. The prophylactic use of antiemetics following laparoscopic procedures of long duration is indicated. Optimizing anesthesiological procedures could lead to a continuous improvement in the quality of therapeutic pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16075255     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-005-0905-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  21 in total

1.  The impact of minor perioperative anesthesia-related incidents, events, and complications on postanesthesia care unit utilization.

Authors:  U Bothner; M Georgieff; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--an analysis of factors affecting operating time.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Feel; John W Davis; Serdar Deger; Jan Roigas; Andreas H Wille; Dietmar Schnorr; Stefan Loening; Amr Abdel Hakiem; Ingolf A Tuerk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.

Authors:  S Suttner; J Boldt; C Schmidt; S Piper; B Kumle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  [Economic aspects of anesthesia. II. Cost control in clinical anesthesia].

Authors:  A Bach; H Schmidt; B W Böttiger; J Motsch
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 0.698

Review 5.  Low-flow anaesthesia. Does it have potential pharmacoeconomic consequences?

Authors:  S Suttner; J Boldt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide: postoperative nausea with vomiting and economic analysis.

Authors:  K Visser; E A Hassink; G J Bonsel; J Moen; C J Kalkman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.

Authors:  M K Rosenberg; P Bridge; M Brown
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Same day surgery for radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it an attainable goal?

Authors:  J S Palmer; E M Worwag; W G Conrad; B F Blitz; G W Chodak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  [Pharmacoeconomical model for cost calculation using a study on prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative phase as an example. Cost effectiveness analysis of a tropisetron supplemented desflurane anaesthesia in comparison to a propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)].

Authors:  L H J Eberhart; S Bernert; H Wulf; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  [Procedure optimization in hospital management].

Authors:  M Bauer; R Hanss; A Schleppers; M Steinfath; P H Tonner; J Martin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.