Literature DB >> 24561168

Incorporating inter-relationships between different levels of genomic data into cancer clinical outcome prediction.

Dokyoon Kim1, Hyunjung Shin2, Kyung-Ah Sohn3, Anurag Verma4, Marylyn D Ritchie5, Ju Han Kim6.   

Abstract

In order to improve our understanding of cancer and develop multi-layered theoretical models for the underlying mechanism, it is essential to have enhanced understanding of the interactions between multiple levels of genomic data that contribute to tumor formation and progression. Although there exist recent approaches such as a graph-based framework that integrates multi-omics data including copy number alteration, methylation, gene expression, and miRNA data for cancer clinical outcome prediction, most of previous methods treat each genomic data as independent and the possible interplay between them is not explicitly incorporated to the model. However, cancer is dysregulated by multiple levels in the biological system through genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic level. Thus, genomic features are likely to interact with other genomic features in the different genomic levels. In order to deepen our knowledge, it would be desirable to incorporate such inter-relationship information when integrating multi-omics data for cancer clinical outcome prediction. In this study, we propose a new graph-based framework that integrates not only multi-omics data but inter-relationship between them for better elucidating cancer clinical outcomes. In order to highlight the validity of the proposed framework, serous cystadenocarcinoma data from TCGA was adopted as a pilot task. The proposed model incorporating inter-relationship between different genomic features showed significantly improved performance compared to the model that does not consider inter-relationship when integrating multi-omics data. For the pair between miRNA and gene expression data, the model integrating miRNA, for example, gene expression, and inter-relationship between them with an AUC of 0.8476 (REI) outperformed the model combining miRNA and gene expression data with an AUC of 0.8404. Similar results were also obtained for other pairs between different levels of genomic data. Integration of different levels of data and inter-relationship between them can aid in extracting new biological knowledge by drawing an integrative conclusion from many pieces of information collected from diverse types of genomic data, eventually leading to more effective screening strategies and alternative therapies that may improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome prediction; Data integration; Inter-relationship; Multi-omics data; Ovarian cancer; TCGA

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561168      PMCID: PMC4664202          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  64 in total

1.  Graph sharpening plus graph integration: a synergy that improves protein functional classification.

Authors:  Hyunjung Shin; Andreas Martin Lisewski; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  NF-kappaB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses.

Authors:  Konstantin D Taganov; Mark P Boldin; Kuang-Jung Chang; David Baltimore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer.

Authors:  Mattia Boeri; Carla Verri; Davide Conte; Luca Roz; Piergiorgio Modena; Federica Facchinetti; Elisa Calabrò; Carlo M Croce; Ugo Pastorino; Gabriella Sozzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Copy number variation influences gene expression and metabolic traits in mice.

Authors:  Luz D Orozco; Shawn J Cokus; Anatole Ghazalpour; Leslie Ingram-Drake; Susanna Wang; Atila van Nas; Nam Che; Jesus A Araujo; Matteo Pellegrini; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins.

Authors:  Rintaro Saito; Michael E Smoot; Keiichiro Ono; Johannes Ruscheinski; Peng-Liang Wang; Samad Lotia; Alexander R Pico; Gary D Bader; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  A ten-microRNA expression signature predicts survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sujaya Srinivasan; Irene Rosita Pia Patric; Kumaravel Somasundaram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Integrated epigenome profiling of repressive histone modifications, DNA methylation and gene expression in normal and malignant urothelial cells.

Authors:  Ewa Dudziec; Andreas Gogol-Döring; Victoria Cookson; Wei Chen; James Catto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MicroRNA expression in abdominal and gluteal adipose tissue is associated with mRNA expression levels and partly genetically driven.

Authors:  Mattias Rantalainen; Blanca M Herrera; George Nicholson; Rory Bowden; Quin F Wills; Josine L Min; Matt J Neville; Amy Barrett; Maxine Allen; Nigel W Rayner; Jan Fleckner; Mark I McCarthy; Krina T Zondervan; Fredrik Karpe; Chris C Holmes; Cecilia M Lindgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  An assessment of recently published gene expression data analyses: reporting experimental design and statistical factors.

Authors:  Peyman Jafari; Francisco Azuaje
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A common and unstable copy number variant is associated with differences in Glo1 expression and anxiety-like behavior.

Authors:  Richard Williams; Jackie E Lim; Bettina Harr; Claudia Wing; Ryan Walters; Margaret G Distler; Meike Teschke; Chunlei Wu; Tim Wiltshire; Andrew I Su; Greta Sokoloff; Lisa M Tarantino; Justin O Borevitz; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Dokyoon Kim; Ruowang Li; Anastasia Lucas; Shefali S Verma; Scott M Dudek; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dokyoon Kim; Ruowang Li; Scott M Dudek; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Multi-layered network-based pathway activity inference using directed random walks: application to predicting clinical outcomes in urologic cancer.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Eun Kyung Choe; Manu Shivakumar; Dokyoon Kim; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Integrative network analysis for survival-associated gene-gene interactions across multiple genomic profiles in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Sangseob Leem; Kyubum Wee; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Identifying subtype-specific associations between gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer.

Authors:  Garam Lee; Lisa Bang; So Yeon Kim; Dokyoon Kim; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  Identification of epigenetic interactions between miRNA and DNA methylation associated with gene expression as potential prognostic markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Manu Shivakumar; Younghee Lee; Lisa Bang; Tullika Garg; Kyung-Ah Sohn; Dokyoon Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  An inference method from multi-layered structure of biomedical data.

Authors:  Myungjun Kim; Yonghyun Nam; Hyunjung Shin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  CLASH: Complementary Linkage with Anchoring and Scoring for Heterogeneous biomolecular and clinical data.

Authors:  Yonghyun Nam; Myungjun Kim; Kyungwon Lee; Hyunjung Shin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Min-redundancy and max-relevance multi-view feature selection for predicting ovarian cancer survival using multi-omics data.

Authors:  Yasser El-Manzalawy; Tsung-Yu Hsieh; Manu Shivakumar; Dokyoon Kim; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Integrative pathway-based survival prediction utilizing the interaction between gene expression and DNA methylation in breast cancer.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Tae Rim Kim; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.