Literature DB >> 8016671

Interobserver variation in the detection of osteopenia by radiography and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

M Jergas1, M Uffmann, H Escher, C C Glüer, K C Young, S Grampp, O Köster, H K Genant.   

Abstract

In 100 patients (20 male, 80 female) radiographs of the lumbar spine were obtained in both planes, anteroposterior and lateral. Nine readers independently and without specific criteria or training assessed the radiographs for presence of osteopenia in the form of a binary decision. A posteranterior dual x-ray absorptiometry (PA DXA) measurement of the lumbar spine was performed in all patients using the Hologic QDR 1000 bone densitometer. A bone mineral density (BMD) of 0.83 g/cm2 (T-score about 2 SD and 2.5 SD lower than BMD in normal young female and male subjects respectively) was used as a threshold for the diagnosis of osteopenia. Complete agreement amongst the 9 readers was achieved in 43 patients. In 26 more patients at least 8 readers agreed. kappa-coefficients for interobserver variation ranged from 0.458 to 0.691 for reader pairs. For agreement between the observer ratings and the DXA results, kappa-coefficients ranging between 0.347 and 0.555 were found. The vast majority of readers agreed in the diagnosis of osteopenia in cases where the BMD was less than 0.73 g/cm2. Where the BMD was between 0.73 and 1.03 g/cm2 a substantial disagreement was found between reader evaluation and DXA measurement, and also amongst the readers. We conclude from our results that osteopenia can reliably be detected from lumbar spine radiographs by all readers only after a substantial amount of BMD is lost. On the other hand, a diagnosis based solely on PA DXA measurement of the spine may also lack accuracy, due to a substantial influence of degenerative changes of the lumbar spine and aortic calcification.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8016671     DOI: 10.1007/bf00197459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  RELATIVE DENSITY OF THE VERTEBRAL END-PLATES AS AN ESTIMATE OF OSTEOPOROSIS.

Authors:  P VIRTAMA; A TELKKAE; T HELELAE
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Uneven distribution of bone minerals and covering effect of non-mineralized tissue as reasons for impaired detectability of bone density from roentgenograms.

Authors:  P VIRTAMA
Journal:  Ann Med Intern Fenn       Date:  1960

3.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry.

Authors:  P J Drinka; A A DeSmet; S F Bauwens; A Rogot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography.

Authors:  G M ARDRAN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1951-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Detection of thoracolumbar vertebral body destruction with lateral spine radiography. Part I: Investigation in cadavers.

Authors:  J Haller; M P André; D Resnick; C Miller; B A Howard; M J Mitchell; J P Schils; D J Sartoris; D Trudell
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Relationship between body mass indices and measures of body adiposity.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R G Israel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Densitometric and visual observations of spinal radiographs.

Authors:  L M Hurxthal; G P Vose; W E Dotter
Journal:  Geriatrics       Date:  1969-05

10.  Clinical relevance of radiologic examination of the skeleton and bone density measurements in osteoporosis of old age.

Authors:  J Kovarik; W Küster; G Seidl; W Linkesch; W Dorda; R Willvonseder; E Kotscher
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  12 in total

1.  Computerized digital imaging techniques provided by digital X-ray radiogrammetry as new diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Joachim Böttcher; Alexander Pfeil; Anders Rosholm; Max-Ludwig Schäfer; Ansgar Malich; Alexander Petrovitch; Bettina Seidl; Gabriele Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Gert Hein; Gunter Wolf; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Rachitic changes, demineralization, and fracture risk in healthy infants and toddlers with vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Henry A Feldman; Paul K Kleinman; Susan A Connolly; Rick A Fair; Regina M Myers; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Digital radiogrammetry as a new diagnostic tool for estimation of disease-related osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis compared with pQCT.

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Pfeil; B Heinrich; G Lehmann; A Petrovitch; A Hansch; J P Heyne; H J Mentzel; A Malich; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Imaging technologies for assessment of skeletal health in men.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Using hand bone mass measurements to assess progression of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mari Hoff; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis: visual assessment on conventional versus digital radiographs.

Authors:  Sabine Wagner; Axel Stäbler; Harald Sittek; Harald Bonel; Gerlinde Laeverenz; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Heterogeneity and Spatial Distribution of Intravertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in the Lumbar Spine Is Associated With Prevalent Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Alexander Adams; Douglas P Kiel; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry is strongly decreased and associated with joint destruction in long-standing rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Helena Forsblad-d'Elia; Hans Carlsten
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Bone loss. Quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; H K Genant
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-03

10.  Evaluation of hand bone loss by digital X-ray radiogrammetry as a complement to clinical and radiographic assessment in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the SWEFOT trial.

Authors:  Hamed Rezaei; Saedis Saevarsdottir; Pierre Geborek; Ingemar F Petersson; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Kristina Forslind
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.