Literature DB >> 3738537

Observer variation in the detection of osteopenia.

D M Epstein, M K Dalinka, F S Kaplan, J M Aronchick, D L Marinelli, H L Kundel.   

Abstract

In order to determine observer variation in the detection of osteopenia, 15 pairs of lateral chest radiographs obtained within two weeks of each other were reviewed separately by two radiologists and one orthopedist on three separate occasions. Intra- and interobserver variations were calculated for each individual film and film pairs using Kappa values. The individual observers were not able to give consistent readings on the same film on different days (average Kappa = 0.54). When the additional factors of repeat films (average kappa = 0.47), or separate observers (average Kappa = 0.38) were analyzed, agreement was even worse. The identification of osteopenia from the lateral view of the thoracic spine is highly subjective and variable from film to film and observer to observer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3738537     DOI: 10.1007/bf00348859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Observer variation in skeletal radiology.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; W M Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Radiologic methods of evaluating generalized osteopenia.

Authors:  R Schneider
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 3.  Visual illusions affecting perception of the roentgen image.

Authors:  R H Daffner
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1983

4.  Osteoporosis.

Authors:  F S Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Symp       Date:  1983

5.  Assessment of metabolic bone diseases by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M L Richardson; H K Genant; C E Cann; B Ettinger; G S Gordan; F O Kolb; U J Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.176

  5 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Bone mineral accrual and low bone mass: a pediatric perspective.

Authors:  Inessa M Gelfand; Linda A DiMeglio
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Interobserver variation in the detection of osteopenia by radiography and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Uffmann; H Escher; C C Glüer; K C Young; S Grampp; O Köster; H K Genant
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis: visual assessment on conventional versus digital radiographs.

Authors:  Sabine Wagner; Axel Stäbler; Harald Sittek; Harald Bonel; Gerlinde Laeverenz; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Double staining with crystal violet and methylene blue is appropriate for colonic endocytoscopy: an in vivo prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Katsuro Ichimasa; Shin-ei Kudo; Yuichi Mori; Kunihiko Wakamura; Nobunao Ikehara; Makoto Kutsukawa; Kenichi Takeda; Masashi Misawa; Toyoki Kudo; Hideyuki Miyachi; Fuyuhiko Yamamura; Shogo Ohkoshi; Shigeharu Hamatani; Haruhiro Inoue
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 7.559

5.  How reliable is a radiological report in osteoporosis in diagnosing low bone density?

Authors:  C D McCullagh; K McCoy; V L S Crawford; H Taggart
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2003-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.