Literature DB >> 12867901

The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength.

Seema K Sharma-Sayal1, P Emile Rossouw, Gajanan V Kulkarni, Keith C Titley.   

Abstract

Many bracket base designs and adhesive materials are in clinical use today. Bases have evolved from perforated metal bases to the present foil mesh bases, and treatments range from none, to spraying metal alloy onto the base, to the most common treatment of microetching. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of orthodontic bracket base design on mean shear bond strength 1 hour or 24 hours after bonding. For each time group, 12 specimens of 6 types of metal brackets were bonded to bovine incisors with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) light-cured composite resin. Brackets were debonded 1 hour or 24 hours later, and the shear bond strength was recorded. Six debonded brackets of each type from each time group were selected at random and sandblasted. All the teeth were cleaned, and half were rebonded with used brackets, and half were rebonded with new brackets. Bond strength was measured again, 1 hour or 24 hours later. Representative specimens were inspected under the scanning electron microscope. Bracket base design significantly affected mean shear bond strength. Speed (60-gauge, microetched foil-mesh base; Strite Industries, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) had the highest bond strength at 1 hour; followed by Time (machined, integral, microetched base with mechanical undercuts; American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis); American Master Series (80-gauge foil-mesh base; American Orthodontics); Ovation Roth (80-gauge layered onto 150-gauge, microetched foil-mesh base; GAC, Central Islip, NY); Orthos Optimesh XRT (100-gauge microetched foil-mesh base; Ormco, Orange, Calif); and, finally, the nickel-free brackets (injection molded, 100-gauge, microetched, foil-mesh base; World Class Technology, McMinnville, Ore). The 24-hour results were similar except that Time had the highest mean shear bond strength (ANOVA, P <.05). Chairside sandblasting significantly affected the 1-hour, but not the 24-hour, mean shear bond strengths (ANOVA, P <.05). Sandblasting appears to be an effective method of cleaning bracket bases before rebonding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867901     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00311-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  22 in total

1.  Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; José María Barrera-Mora; José María Llamas-Carreras; Enrique Solano-Reina; D Rodríguez; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Ishida; Toshiya Endo; Koichi Shinkai; Yoshiroh Katoh
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal.

Authors:  S Yassaei; H Aghili; E KhanPayeh; M Goldani Moghadam
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Reconditioning of self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Esmeralda Xheka; Andrea Scribante; Paola Gandini; Giuseppe Sfondrini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  In vitro evaluation of self-etch bonding in orthodontics using cyclic fatigue.

Authors:  Ameerah Yousef Mansour; James L Drummond; Carla A Evans; Zuhair Bakhsh
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Effects of cyclic loading on the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to resin composite veneer surface using different conditioning protocols.

Authors:  Shaza M Hammad; Mai S El Banna
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Quantitative analysis of mechanically retentive ceramic bracket base surfaces with a three-dimensional imaging system.

Authors:  Da-Young Kang; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparison of shear bond strength of brackets recycled using micro sandblasting and industrial methods.

Authors:  Manuela M Haro Montero; Ascensión Vicente; Noelia Alfonso-Hernández; Manuel Jiménez-López; Luis-Alberto Bravo-González
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times.

Authors:  Sanjay Prasad Gupta; Basanta Kumar Shrestha
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.