Literature DB >> 22143910

Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment.

Eduardo Espinar-Escalona1, José María Barrera-Mora, José María Llamas-Carreras, Enrique Solano-Reina, D Rodríguez, F J Gil.   

Abstract

In oral orthodontic treatments, achievement of a good adhesion between brackets and teeth surfaces is essential. One way to increase adhesion is to apply a surface treatment of teeth facing surfaces through the projection of abrasive particles to produce a surface roughness which improves adhesion of the bracket to the tooth, because of the significantly increased contact between the two surfaces. The effect on adhesion through the use of this technique in different types of brackets, as well as through the use of different blasting particles, however, is yet not well described. In this study we have included three types of brackets which are commonly used in orthodontic therapies (two of them a mesh-type and the third one a micro-milled type) with a contact surface area of 11.16, 8.85 and 6.89 mm(2) respectively. These brackets were used combined with a sandblasting treatment with two different types of abrasive particles, alumina (Al(2)O(3)) and silicon carbide (SiC) and applied to natural teeth in vitro. The abrasive particles used are bio-compatible and usually used in achieving increased roughness for improved adherence in biomedical materials. Sandblasting was performed at 2 bars for 2 s; three particle sizes were used: 80, 200 and 600 μm. Non-blasted samples were used as control. Each of the pieces were cemented to natural teeth with a self-curing composite. Samples were stored in physiologic serum at 5°C temperature. Tensile tests were performed with a universal testing machine. Brackets treated with sandblasted particles were measured to have an increased adhesion as compared to the control sample. The highest bond strength was measured for samples sandblasted with alumina particles of 80 and 200 μm combined with micro-milled brackets. The recorded stresses did not exceed the tensile strength of tooth enamel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143910     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  18 in total

1.  A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.

Authors:  A E Sargison; J F McCabe; D T Millett
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1999-06

2.  Airbrasive: some fundamentals.

Authors:  R B BLACK
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases.

Authors:  G A MacColl; P E Rossouw; K C Titley; C Yamin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Sandblasting of bands to increase bond strength.

Authors:  S Miller; J H Zernik
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1996-04

5.  Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain.

Authors:  D Cochran; K L O'Keefe; D T Turner; J M Powers
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases.

Authors:  L V Siomka; J M Powers
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-08

7.  The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  D Regan; B LeMasney; R van Noort
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [An in-vitro study on improving the bonding strength of steel bands with the use of glass ionomer cements].

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; R R Miethke; A H Appenzeller
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1993-08

9.  Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces.

Authors:  Petra Schmage; Ibrahim Nergiz; Wolfram Herrmann; Mutlu Ozcan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain.

Authors:  Y O Zachrisson; B U Zachrisson; T Büyükyilmaz
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of shear bond strength of brackets recycled using micro sandblasting and industrial methods.

Authors:  Manuela M Haro Montero; Ascensión Vicente; Noelia Alfonso-Hernández; Manuel Jiménez-López; Luis-Alberto Bravo-González
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo.

Authors:  Jéssika Lagni Tonus; Fernanda Borguetti Manfroi; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Eduardo Correa Grigolo; Sérgio Helegda; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

3.  "In Vitro" Study About Variables that Influence in Arch Friction with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors:  Javier Moyano; Laia Mases; Telmo Izeta; Teresa Flores; Javier Fernández-Bozal; Javier Gil; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Wanda Urbanová; Bohuslav Novák; Iveta Waczulíková; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.