Literature DB >> 25230006

Comparison of shear bond strength of brackets recycled using micro sandblasting and industrial methods.

Manuela M Haro Montero1, Ascensión Vicente, Noelia Alfonso-Hernández, Manuel Jiménez-López, Luis-Alberto Bravo-González.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the shear bond strength of brackets recycled by sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles of different sizes or reconditioned industrially after successive rebonding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty brackets were bonded and debonded sequentially three times. After the first debonding, brackets were divided into four groups: (group 1) sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles of 25 μ, (group 2) 50 μ, and (group 3) 110 μ, and (group 4) industrial recycling. Bond strength and adhesive material remaining on debonded bracket bases were evaluated for each successive debond.
RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between the four groups following the first recycle (P > .05). After the second recycle, bond strength was significantly greater for the industrially recycled group than the other groups (P < .016). When shear bond strength was compared within each recycling method, the bond strength of sandblasted brackets decreased with the increase of particle size and with each recycle; for the industrially recycled group, no significant differences were detected between the three sequences (P > .016). In the evaluation of bond material remnant, the industrially recycled group left significantly less bond material after successive recycling than the other groups did (P < .016). Within each recycling method, the adhesive remnant decreased significantly after successive debond (P < .016).
CONCLUSIONS: Industrial recycling obtained better results than sandblasting after three successive debondings. The brackets' shear bond strength decreased as the size of the aluminum oxide particle used for sandblasting increased and as recycling was repeated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Industrial recycling; Recycled; Sandblasting; Shear bond strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25230006      PMCID: PMC8612426          DOI: 10.2319/032414-221.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  24 in total

1.  The effects of in-office reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear/peel bond strength.

Authors:  A M Basudan; S E Al-Emran
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2001-09

2.  The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength.

Authors:  Seema K Sharma-Sayal; P Emile Rossouw; Gajanan V Kulkarni; Keith C Titley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A three-cycle in vivo evaluation of reconditioned direct-bonding brackets.

Authors:  A Buchwald
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Recycling bands and brackets.

Authors:  K M Postlethwaite
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1992-05

5.  Office reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments.

Authors:  Andrew N Quick; Angela M P Harris; Vince P Joseph
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  A L Sonis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The effects of recycling on the tensile bond strength of new and clinically used stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  D Regan; R van Noort; C O'Keeffe
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1990-05

8.  The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases.

Authors:  G A MacColl; P E Rossouw; K C Titley; C Yamin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  D Regan; B LeMasney; R van Noort
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A 12 month clinical study of bond failures of recycled versus new stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Vittorio Cacciafesta; Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Birte Melsen; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser.

Authors:  Mohamad Hossein Tudehzaeim; Soghra Yassaei; Shohreh Taherimoghadam
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-02

2.  Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Mohammad Hashem Hosseini; Nasim Chiniforoush; Armin Soudi; Meisam Moradi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-01

3.  A Comparative Study on the Effect of Different Methods of Recycling Orthodontic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength.

Authors:  Purna Prasad Khanal; Basanta Kumar Shrestha; Rajiv Yadav; Sanjay Prasad Gupta
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-01-21

4.  Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets.

Authors:  Mihai Urichianu; Steven Makowka; David Covell; Stephen Warunek; Thikriat Al-Jewair
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laser.

Authors:  Mojgan Kachoei; Amir Mohammadi; Maziar Esmaili Moghaddam; Sahand Rikhtegaran; Mahmoud Pourghaznein; Sajjad Shirazi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.