Literature DB >> 21720417

Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK.

P Lazon de la Jara1, D Erickson, P Erickson, F Stapleton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine how laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) affects quality of life (QOL) and to identify factors that may affect satisfaction after LASIK.
METHODS: A total of 104 patients with a mean age of 29±6, treated with LASIK for myopia and astigmatism, were enrolled in a prospective study. High (90%) and low (10%) contrast visual acuity (CVA) were measured under photopic and scotopic conditions before surgery and at 3 months later. A multidimensional QOL scale (Institute for Eye Research multidimensional QOL scale), which assesses psychological characteristics, personality traits, cosmesis, frequency, and tolerance to disturbing visual and ocular symptoms, and overall satisfaction with vision correction, was also used. Paired rank tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative vision and QOL scores. Correlations and a multiple linear regression were used to describe the relationship between CVA, QOL, and satisfaction after LASIK.
RESULTS: Significant postoperative changes included increased satisfaction following LASIK (P<0.001), reduced frequency of visual and ocular symptoms (P<0.001), and change in psychological characteristics (P=0.033). The change in satisfaction with LASIK can be predicted by a combination of preoperative satisfaction, postoperative frequency of disturbing visual and ocular symptoms, postoperative mean spherical equivalent, and postoperative scotopic high CVA (R (2)=0.725, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with LASIK is related to visual function, preoperative expectations, psychological characteristics, and uncorrected CVA achieved. An increased sense of subjective well-being, adaptability, and self-efficacy was evident after LASIK. Patients reported a more optimistic attitude to life and increase perceived QOL after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720417      PMCID: PMC3178233          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  31 in total

Review 1.  Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.

Authors:  W Wood
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Cognitive dissonance, the placebo effect and the evaluation of surgical results.

Authors:  J J Homer; C E Sheard; N S Jones
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2000-06

3.  Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges.

Authors:  D L Patrick; Y P Chiang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  A E Miller; J P McCulley; R W Bowman; H D Cavanagh; X H Wang
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  2001-04

5.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia up to -11 diopters with up to -5 diopters of astigmatism with the summit autonomous LADARVision excimer laser system.

Authors:  M B McDonald; J D Carr; J M Frantz; A M Kozarsky; E Maguen; A B Nesburn; Y S Rabinowitz; J J Salz; R D Stulting; K P Thompson; G O Waring
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Laser in situ keratomileusis with a scanning excimer laser for the correction of low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism.

Authors:  G Balazsi; M Mullie; L Lasswell; P A Lee; Y J Duh
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The refractive status and vision profile: a questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error.

Authors:  S Vitale; O D Schein; C L Meinert; E P Steinberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.

Authors:  I Brunette; J Gresset; J F Boivin; M Pop; P Thompson; G P Lafond; H Makni
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  I Brunette; J Gresset; J F Boivin; H Boisjoly; H Makni
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Pre-operative Quality of Life and psychological factors that influence patient decision making in LASIK.

Authors:  P Lazon de la Jara; D Erickson; P Erickson; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  10 in total

1.  Satisfaction with life in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS): associations with health-related consequences of MFS, pain, fatigue, and demographic factors.

Authors:  Gry Velvin; Trine Bathen; Svend Rand-Hendriksen; Amy Østertun Geirdal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Commentary: Pre-aesthetic workup: Should it be a part of pre-refractive surgery workup?

Authors:  Ritika Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Marfan Syndrome-Polish Study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Trawicka; Aleksandra Lewandowska-Walter; Mikołaj Majkowicz; Robert Sabiniewicz; Lidia Woźniak-Mielczarek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Mahfouth A Bamashmus; Khammash Hubaish; Mohammed Alawad; Hisham Alakhlee
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on mental health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Kaoru Tounaka-Fujii; Kenya Yuki; Kazuno Negishi; Ikuko Toda; Takayuki Abe; Keisuke Kouyama; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-26

6.  Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Review.

Authors:  Nathalie P Y Chiam; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

7.  Periorbital aesthetic concerns in patients seeking corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Milind N Naik; Mohammed A Khader; Somasheila I Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Visual Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following LASIK on Eyes with Low Myopia and Astigmatism.

Authors:  Smita Agarwal; Erin Thornell; Chris Hodge; Gerard Sutton; Paul Hughes
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2018-05-31

9.  Reversal of Myopic Correction for Patients Intolerant to LASIK.

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Patients' satisfaction and subjective happiness after refractive surgery for myopia.

Authors:  Shinichiro Matsuguma; Kazuno Negishi; Motoko Kawashima; Ikuko Toda; Masahiko Ayaki; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.