Literature DB >> 12848325

The information for catching fly balls: judging and intercepting virtual balls in a CAVE.

Frank T J M Zaal1, Claire F Michaels.   

Abstract

Visually guided action implies the existence of information as well as a control law relating that information to movement. For ball catching, the Chapman Strategy--keeping constant the rate of change of the tangent of the elevation angle (d(tan(alpha))/dt)--leads a catcher to the right location at the right time to intercept a fly ball. Previous studies showed the ability to detect the information and the consistency of running patterns with the use of the strategy. However, only direct manipulation of information can show its use. Participants were asked to intercept virtual balls in a Cave Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) or to judge whether balls would pass behind or in front of them. Catchers in the CAVE successfully intercepted virtual balls with their forehead. Furthermore, the timing of judgments was related to the patterns of changing d(tan(alpha))/dt. The advantages and disadvantages of a CAVE as a tool for studying interceptive action are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848325     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Base on balls for the Chapman strategy: reassessing Brouwer, Brenner, and Smeets (2002).

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers; Gert-Jan Pepping; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Complex Adaptive Behavior and Dexterous Action.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10

3.  Catching fly balls in virtual reality: a critical test of the outfielder problem.

Authors:  Philip W Fink; Patrick S Foo; William H Warren
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How soccer players head the ball: a test of Optic Acceleration Cancellation theory with virtual reality.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Stuart Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Barbara La Scaleia; Francesca Ceccarelli; Antonella Maselli; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Initiation of evasive manoeuvres during self-motion: a test of three hypotheses.

Authors:  James R Tresilian; Guy M Wallis; Craig Mattocks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coincidence Anticipation Timing Responses with Head Tracking and Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Erin Ross; Micah Kinney; Nick Fogt
Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Keeping your eyes continuously on the ball while running for catchable and uncatchable fly balls.

Authors:  Dees B W Postma; A Rob den Otter; Frank T J M Zaal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The head tracks and gaze predicts: how the world's best batters hit a ball.

Authors:  David L Mann; Wayne Spratford; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  When a Fly Ball Is Out of Reach: Catchability Judgments Are Not Based on Optical Acceleration Cancelation.

Authors:  Dees B W Postma; Joanne Smith; Gert-Jan Pepping; Steven van Andel; Frank T J M Zaal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.