Literature DB >> 20055547

Catching fly balls in virtual reality: a critical test of the outfielder problem.

Philip W Fink1, Patrick S Foo, William H Warren.   

Abstract

How does a baseball outfielder know where to run to catch a fly ball? The "outfielder problem" remains unresolved, and its solution would provide a window into the visual control of action. It may seem obvious that human action is based on an internal model of the physical world, such that the fielder predicts the landing point based on a mental model of the ball's trajectory (TP). However, two alternative theories, Optical Acceleration Cancellation (OAC) and Linear Optical Trajectory (LOT), propose that fielders are led to the right place at the right time by coupling their movements to visual information in a continuous "online" manner. All three theories predict successful catches and similar running paths. We provide a critical test by using virtual reality to perturb the vertical motion of the ball in mid-flight. The results confirm the predictions of OAC but are at odds with LOT and TP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20055547      PMCID: PMC3816735          DOI: 10.1167/9.13.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Does the brain model Newton's laws?

Authors:  J McIntyre; M Zago; A Berthoz; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Baseball outfielders maintain a linear optical trajectory when tracking uncatchable fly balls.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Michael K McBeath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: can acceleration be used in interception?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

4.  The optic trajectory is not a lot of use if you want to catch the ball.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The information for catching fly balls: judging and intercepting virtual balls in a CAVE.

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Claire F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The visual perception of accelerated motion.

Authors:  J Schmerler
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Visual acceleration detection: effect of sign and motion orientation.

Authors:  J B Calderone; M K Kaiser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

8.  Projected free fall trajectories. I. Theory and simulation.

Authors:  B V Saxberg
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Role of image acceleration in judging landing location of free-falling projectiles.

Authors:  T G Babler; J L Dannemiller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  How soccer players head the ball: a test of Optic Acceleration Cancellation theory with virtual reality.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Stuart Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  25 in total

1.  Base on balls for the Chapman strategy: reassessing Brouwer, Brenner, and Smeets (2002).

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers; Gert-Jan Pepping; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Emergent perception-action couplings regulate postural adjustments during performance of externally-timed dynamic interceptive actions.

Authors:  Joseph A Stone; I W Maynard; J S North; D Panchuk; K Davids
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-27

3.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 5.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Hand interception of occluded motion in humans: a test of model-based vs. on-line control.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Innovating Occupational Safety Training: A Scoping Review on Digital Games and Possible Applications in Agriculture.

Authors:  Lucia Vigoroso; Federica Caffaro; Margherita Micheletti Cremasco; Eugenio Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Synergies between optical and physical variables in intercepting parabolic targets.

Authors:  José Gómez; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is.

Authors:  Andrew D Wilson; Sabrina Golonka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.