Literature DB >> 27162839

Short-term Outcome of Open Appendectomy in Southern Iran: A Single Center Experience.

Shahram Paydar1, Parisa Javidi Parsijani1, Armin Akbarzadeh2, Alireza Manafi3, Fariborz Ghaffarpasand1, Hamid Reza Abbasi1, Shahram Bolandparvaz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term outcome of open appendectomy, the rate of negative appendectomy as well as pathology reports after surgery in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study being performed in Nemazee hospital affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Science during a 2-year period between 2008 and 2010. The medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent open appendectomy in our center due to acute appendicitis were included in the study. The elective and laparoscopic appendectomies were excluded. The demographic information, clinical findings, laboratory investigations and the histopathological examination of the appendix were recorded and reported.
RESULTS: A total of 337 patient including 137 (36.4%) females, and 240 (63.6%) males with the mean age of 16.26 ± 9.81 (range 3 to 76) years were stduied. Anorexia (64.7%) and fever (20.7%) were more prevalent symptoms. The mean duration between pain initiation and operation ranged from 0 to 14 days with mean 1.88 ± 1.63 days. Right lower quadrant (RLQ), periumbilical, epigastria, left lower quadrant (LLQ), and Right upper quadrant (RUQ), pain were manifest in 78.8%, 41.6%, 12.2%, 3.2%, and    1.3% of patients, respectively. Pathological evaluation of the appendix showed appendicitis in 70.4% of patients.
CONCLUSION: The higher rate of negative appendectomy accounts for wasteful tapping of medical resources and causing further complication in patients. Therefore it is essential to conduct more accurate studies to detect the root cause of the disease. This would help improve the management of appendicitis which is an emergency condition with high incidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute appendicitis; Iran; Open appendectomy; Short-term outcome

Year:  2013        PMID: 27162839      PMCID: PMC4779173     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma        ISSN: 2322-2522


  23 in total

1.  Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.

Authors:  A C van Breda Vriesman; B J Kole; J B C M Puylaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].

Authors:  M N Wente; H Waleczek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Diagnostic accuracy in 2,351 patients undergoing appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis: A retrospective study 1986-1993.

Authors:  J Styrud; S Eriksson; J Segelman; L Granström
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Analysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992.

Authors:  R J Baigrie; T C Dehn; S M Fowler; D C Dunn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children.

Authors:  B M Garcia Peña; K D Mandl; S J Kraus; A C Fischer; G R Fleisher; D P Lund; G A Taylor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study.

Authors:  P G Larsson; G Henriksson; M Olsson; J Boris; P Ströberg; S E Tronstad; S Skullman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group.

Authors:  C Ohmann; Q Yang; C Franke
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1995-04

10.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of the Macroscopically Normal Appendix Left in Situ in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis.

Authors:  Sara Lee; Tara M Connelly; Jessica M Ryan; Megan Power-Foley; Peter M Neary
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy; Results of a Cohort Study in a Single Iranian Center.

Authors:  Somaye Bazdar; Maryam Dehghankhalili; Shekoofeh Yaghmaei; Maryam Azadegan; Amirhossein Pourdavood; Mohammad Hadi Niakan; Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.