Literature DB >> 12839786

Optimization of a reusable hollow-fiber ultrafilter for simultaneous concentration of enteric bacteria, protozoa, and viruses from water.

Hugo A Morales-Morales1, Guadalupe Vidal, John Olszewski, Channah M Rock, Debanjana Dasgupta, Kevin H Oshima, Geoffrey B Smith.   

Abstract

The detection and identification of pathogens from water samples remain challenging due to variations in recovery rates and the cost of procedures. Ultrafiltration offers the possibility to concentrate viral, bacterial, and protozoan organisms in a single process by using size-exclusion-based filtration. In this study, two hollow-fiber ultrafilters with 50,000-molecular-weight cutoffs were evaluated to concentrate microorganisms from 2- and 10-liter water samples. When known quantities (10(5) to 10(6) CFU/liter) of two species of enteric bacteria were introduced and concentrated from 2 liters of sterile water, the addition of 0.1% Tween 80 increased Escherichia coli strain K-12 recoveries from 70 to 84% and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis recoveries from 36 to 72%. An E. coli antibiotic-resistant strain, XL1-Blue, was recovered at a level (87%) similar to that for strain K-12 (96%) from 10 liters of sterile water. When E. coli XL1-Blue was introduced into 10 liters of nonsterile Rio Grande water with higher turbidity levels (23 to 29 nephelometric turbidity units) at two inoculum levels (9 x 10(5) and 2.4 x 10(3) per liter), the recovery efficiencies were 89 and 92%, respectively. The simultaneous addition of E. coli XL1-Blue (9 x 10(5) CFU/liter), Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (10 oocysts/liter), phage T1 (10(5) PFU/liter), and phage PP7 (10(5) PFU/liter) to 10 liters of Rio Grande surface water resulted in mean recoveries of 96, 54, 59, and 46%, respectively. Using a variety of surface waters from around the United States, we obtained recovery efficiencies for bacteria and viruses that were similar to those observed with the Rio Grande samples, but recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts was decreased, averaging 32% (the site of collection of these samples had previously been identified as problematic for oocyst recovery). Results indicate that the use of ultrafiltration for simultaneous recovery of bacterial, viral, and protozoan pathogens from variable surface waters is ready for field deployment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12839786      PMCID: PMC165154          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4098-4102.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Concentration and detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water samples by method 1622 using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration.

Authors:  O D Simmons; M D Sobsey; C D Heaney; F W Schaefer; D S Francy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Efficient and predictable recovery of viruses from water by small scale ultrafiltration systems.

Authors:  L J Winona; A W Ommani; J Olszewski; J B Nuzzo; K H Oshima
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Concentration of enteroviruses from large volumes of tap water, treated sewage, and seawater.

Authors:  C P Gerba; S R Farrah; S M Goyal; C Wallis; J L Melnick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Ultrafiltration processes in biotechnology.

Authors:  R S Tutunjian
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Concentration of Giardia lamblia cysts, Legionella pneumophila, Clostridium perfringens, human enteric viruses, and coliphages from large volumes of drinking water, using a single filtration.

Authors:  P Payment; A Bérubé; D Perreault; R Armon; M Trudel
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from a wide variety of 10-L surface water samples.

Authors:  Ryan C Kuhn; Kevin H Oshima
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Isolation and characterization of a nitrite reductase gene and its use as a probe for denitrifying bacteria.

Authors:  G B Smith; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effects of humic materials on virus recovery from water.

Authors:  N Guttman-Bass; J Catalano-Sherman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The removal of phages T1 and PP7, and poliovirus from fluids with hollow-fiber ultrafilters with molecular weight cut-offs of 50,000, 13,000, and 6000.

Authors:  K H Oshima; T T Evans-Strickfaden; A K Highsmith; E W Ades
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1995 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for recovery of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from environmental samples.

Authors:  P A Rochelle; R De Leon; A Johnson; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  27 in total

1.  Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration and PCR detection of human-associated genetic markers from various types of surface water in Florida.

Authors:  Stephaney D Leskinen; Miriam Brownell; Daniel V Lim; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Tangential-flow ultrafiltration with integrated inhibition detection for recovery of surrogates and human pathogens from large-volume source water and finished drinking water.

Authors:  Kristen E Gibson; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Current and developing technologies for monitoring agents of bioterrorism and biowarfare.

Authors:  Daniel V Lim; Joyce M Simpson; Elizabeth A Kearns; Marianne F Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Rotavirus detection in environmental water samples by tangential flow ultrafiltration and RT-nested PCR.

Authors:  Tiziana Grassi; Francesco Bagordo; Adele Idolo; Federica Lugoli; Giovanni Gabutti; Antonella De Donno
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Bayesian Modeling of Enteric Virus Density in Wastewater Using Left-Censored Data.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kato; Takayuki Miura; Satoshi Okabe; Daisuke Sano
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Rapid sample processing for detection of food-borne pathogens via cross-flow microfiltration.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Eduardo Ximenes; Mary Anne Roshni Amalaradjou; Hunter B Vibbert; Kirk Foster; Jim Jones; Xingya Liu; Arun K Bhunia; Michael R Ladisch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Development of the microbial communities in Lake Donghu in relation to water quality.

Authors:  Jian Guo Jiang; Yun-Fen Shen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Rapid ultrafiltration concentration and biosensor detection of enterococci from large volumes of Florida recreational water.

Authors:  Stephaney D Leskinen; Daniel V Lim
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Dead-end hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for recovery of diverse microbes from water.

Authors:  Carmela M Smith; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Recovery of diverse microbes in high turbidity surface water samples using dead-end ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Bonnie Mull; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.