Literature DB >> 12838373

Comparison of 16-frame and 8-frame gated SPET imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Sachin M Navare1, Frans J T Wackers, Yi-Hwa Liu.   

Abstract

Electrocardiographic (ECG) gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET) allows for simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. Presently 8-frame per cardiac cycle ECG gating of SPET images is standard. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 8-frame and 16-frame gated SPET on measurements of LV volumes and to evaluate the effects of the presence of myocardial perfusion defects and of radiotracer dose administered on the calculation of LV volumes. A total of 86 patients underwent technetium-99m SPET myocardial perfusion imaging using 16-frame per cardiac cycle acquisition. Eight-frame gated SPET images were generated by summation of contiguous frames. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated from the 16-frame and 8-frame data sets. The patients were divided into groups according to the administered dose of the radiotracer and the size of the perfusion defect. Results. Sixteen frame per cardiac cycle acquisition resulted in significantly larger EDV (122+/-72 ml vs 115+/-68 ml, P<0.0001), smaller ESV (64+/-58.6 ml vs 67.6+/-59.5 ml, P<0.0001), and higher LVEF (55.3%+/-18% vs 49%+/-17.4%, P<0.0001) as compared to 8-frame SPET imaging. This effect was seen regardless of whether a high or a low dose was administered and whether or not significant perfusion defects were present. This study shows that EDV, ESV and LVEF determined by 16-frame gated SPET are significantly different from those determined by 8-frame gated SPET. The radiotracer dose and perfusion defects do not affect estimation of LV parameters by 16-frame gated SPET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838373     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1231-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  24 in total

1.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion images: methodology and validation of the Yale-CQ method.

Authors:  Y H Liu; A J Sinusas; P DeMan; B L Zaret; F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Assessment of left ventricular volume using ECG-gated SPECT with technetium-99m-MIBI and technetium-99m-tetrofosmin.

Authors:  T Mochizuki; K Murase; H Tanaka; T Kondoh; K Hamamoto; W N Tauxe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI.

Authors:  E Vallejo; D P Dione; W L Bruni; R T Constable; P P Borek; J P Soares; J G Carr; S G Condos; F J Wackers; A J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; P W Brandt; R M Whitlock; C J Wild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  End-systolic volume and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Authors:  A W Hamer; M Takayama; K A Abraham; A H Roche; A R Kerr; B F Williams; M C Ramage; H D White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact.

Authors:  E G DePuey; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  A Manrique; M Faraggi; P Véra; D Vilain; R Lebtahi; A Cribier; D Le Guludec
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Determining the accuracy of calculating systolic wall thickening using a fast Fourier transform approximation: a simulation study based on canine and patient data.

Authors:  C D Cooke; E V Garcia; S J Cullom; T L Faber; R I Pettigrew
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Relationship of gated SPECT ventricular function parameters to angiographic measurements.

Authors:  K Nichols; J Tamis; E G DePuey; J Mieres; S Malhotra; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  18 in total

1.  A historical perspective on measurement of ventricular function with scintigraphic techniques: Part II--Ventricular function with gated techniques for blood pool and perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: major tool of modern nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  EANM/ESC guidelines for radionuclide imaging of cardiac function.

Authors:  B Hesse; T B Lindhardt; W Acampa; C Anagnostopoulos; J Ballinger; J J Bax; L Edenbrandt; A Flotats; G Germano; T Gmeiner Stopar; P Franken; A Kelion; A Kjaer; D Le Guludec; M Ljungberg; A F Maenhout; C Marcassa; J Marving; F McKiddie; W M Schaefer; L Stegger; R Underwood
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  New software methods to cope with reduced counting statistics: shorter SPECT acquisitions and many more possibilities.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: an update.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Piotr Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Assessment of RV function using gated blood pool SPECT.

Authors:  Serge D Van Kriekinge; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  A comparison of 8 and 16 frames gated SPECT imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: effects of gender and myocardial counts.

Authors:  Mahdi Mazinani; Mohammad Ali Tajik-Mansoury; Mahsa Sabour; Majid Jadidi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Comparison of 8-frame and 16-frame thallium-201 gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for determining left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Yoji Sumimoto; Hiroki Ikenaga; Noriaki Watanabe; Ken Ishibashi; Yoshihiro Dohi; Yukihiro Fukuda; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction "half-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" filtered backprojection.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey; Ramesh Gadiraju; John Clark; Linda Thompson; Frank Anstett; Shuli C Shwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.