Literature DB >> 33575863

A comparison of 8 and 16 frames gated SPECT imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: effects of gender and myocardial counts.

Mahdi Mazinani1, Mohammad Ali Tajik-Mansoury2,3, Mahsa Sabour4, Majid Jadidi1.   

Abstract

In myocardial gated SPECT imaging each cardiac cycle is divided into 8 or 16 temporal frames and the cause of the difference between 8 and 16 frames is not specified exactly. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of myocardial detector counts and gender on the difference between 8 and 16 frames and also to compare the LVEF obtained by 8 and 16 frames with echocardiography. The study population included 84 patients who underwent gated SPECT imaging. Left ventricular parameters were assessed on 8 and 16 frames gated SPECT. LVEF was also measured with two-dimensional echocardiography within 5-10 days after gated SPECT imaging. There was a good correlation between 8 and 16 frames for calculation of LVEF (p = 0.00, r = 0.860), EDV (p = 0.00, r = 0.965) and ESV (p = 0.00, r = 0.956) in all patients. But the difference between 8 and 16 frames for calculation of LVEF (p = 0.00), EDV (p = 0.014) and ESV (p = 0.00) was statistically significant. This difference was assessed separately in females, males, patients with high photon counts and patients with low photon counts and in all subgroups was statistically significant difference in the estimation of LVEF and ESV (p < 0.05) but no significant difference in the estimation of EDV (p > 0.05). Echocardiography resulted in smaller LVEF as compared to 8 and 16 frames gated SPECT studies and there was a significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.00). The myocardial detector counts and gender have no effect on the difference between 8 and 16 frames methods and the LVEF on echocardiography is smaller than the gated SPECT, but the 8-frame is closer to echocardiography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  8 and 16 frames gated SPECT; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; LV volumes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33575863     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  12 in total

1.  Are ejection fractions from gated SPECT perfusion studies clinically useful? A comparison with radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  G A Wright; M McDade; W Keeble; W Martin; I Hutton
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with electrocardiography-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: comparison with multigated equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  S Kumita; K Cho; H Nakajo; M Toba; M Uwamori; S Mizumura; T Kumazaki; J Sano; S Sakai; K Munakata
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Comparison of 16-frame and 8-frame gated SPET imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Authors:  Sachin M Navare; Frans J T Wackers; Yi-Hwa Liu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  The diagnostic and prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Vanessa Go; Mehul R Bhatt; Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Asit K Paul; Hani A Nabi
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2004-12

6.  Comparison of 8-frame and 16-frame thallium-201 gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for determining left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Yoji Sumimoto; Hiroki Ikenaga; Noriaki Watanabe; Ken Ishibashi; Yoshihiro Dohi; Yukihiro Fukuda; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Echocardiographic validation of gated SPECT ventricular function measurements.

Authors:  K Nichols; D Lefkowitz; T Faber; R Folks; D Cooke; E V Garcia; S S Yao; E G DePuey; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Is 16-frame really superior to 8-frame gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction? Comparison of two simultaneously acquired gated SPECT studies.

Authors:  Giulia Montelatici; Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Manjola Dona; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision.

Authors:  Hein J Verberne; Wanda Acampa; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; Jim Ballinger; Frank Bengel; Pieter De Bondt; Ronny R Buechel; Alberto Cuocolo; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Albert Flotats; Marcus Hacker; Cecilia Hindorf; Philip A Kaufmann; Oliver Lindner; Michael Ljungberg; Markus Lonsdale; Alain Manrique; David Minarik; Arthur J H A Scholte; Riemer H J A Slart; Elin Trägårdh; Tim C de Wit; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Outcome of Sub-Massive Pulmonary Thromboemboli in Patients Who Received Thrombolytic and or Non-Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Hasan Allah Sadeghi; Mona Heidarali; Fusieh Faraji; Behshid Ghadrdoost; Maryam Shojaeifard
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.