Literature DB >> 12836023

Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli.

Stefanie Richter1, Petra Jansen-Osmann, Jürgen Konczak, Karl-Theodor Kalveram.   

Abstract

When humans are exposed to external forces while performing arm movements, they adapt by compensating for these novel forces. The basis of this learning process is thought to be a neural representation that models the relation between all forces acting upon the system and the kinematic effects they produce, called inverse dynamic model (IDM). The present study investigated whether and how the predictability of a given external force affects the selection of an appropriate motor response to compensate for such force. Adult human subjects ( N=32) held a handle that could rotate around the elbow joint and learned to perform goal-directed forearm flexion movements, while an external velocity-dependent negative damping force was applied that assisted forearm movement. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. In the associative group, the applied damping force was always associated with a specific initial position. Thus, after initial learning, the force application became predictable. In the non-associative group, where the same movements were performed, the applied force was independent of the initial position, so that no association between force and location could be formed. We found that only the associative group significantly reduced target error when damping was present. That is, the location cue aided these subjects in generating dynamic responses in the appropriate limb. Our results indicate that motor adaptation to different dynamic environments can be facilitated by indicative stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12836023     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0140-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  11 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Context estimation for sensorimotor control.

Authors:  P Vetter; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?

Authors:  A Karniel; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

5.  Pattern generating and reflex-like processes controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia, damping and gravity. A theoretical note.

Authors:  K T Kalveram
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Motor learning by field approximation.

Authors:  F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Development of force adaptation during childhood.

Authors:  Jürgen Konczak; Petra Jansen-Osmann; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  6 in total

1.  Referent control and motor equivalence of reaching from standing.

Authors:  Yosuke Tomita; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Coordinate Representations for Interference Reduction in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Yeo; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Consecutive learning of opposing unimanual motor tasks using the right arm followed by the left arm causes intermanual interference.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiple motor memories are learned to control different points on a tool.

Authors:  James B Heald; James N Ingram; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-04-09

5.  The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The level of performance stabilization influences motor adaptation on an isometric force control task.

Authors:  Suziane Peixoto Dos Santos; Rodolfo N Benda; Crislaine Rangel Couto; Carlos Eduardo Campos; André Gustavo Pereira Andrade; Guilherme M Lage; Herbert Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.