Literature DB >> 27784802

Referent control and motor equivalence of reaching from standing.

Yosuke Tomita1,2, Anatol G Feldman3,2, Mindy F Levin4,2.   

Abstract

Motor actions may result from central changes in the referent body configuration, defined as the body posture at which muscles begin to be activated or deactivated. The actual body configuration deviates from the referent configuration, particularly because of body inertia and environmental forces. Within these constraints, the system tends to minimize the difference between these configurations. For pointing movement, this strategy can be expressed as the tendency to minimize the difference between the referent trajectory (RT) and actual trajectory (QT) of the effector (hand). This process may underlie motor equivalent behavior that maintains the pointing trajectory regardless of the number of body segments involved. We tested the hypothesis that the minimization process is used to produce pointing in standing subjects. With eyes closed, 10 subjects reached from a standing position to a remembered target located beyond arm length. In randomly chosen trials, hip flexion was unexpectedly prevented, forcing subjects to take a step during pointing to prevent falling. The task was repeated when subjects were instructed to intentionally take a step during pointing. In most cases, reaching accuracy and trajectory curvature were preserved due to adaptive condition-specific changes in interjoint coordination. Results suggest that referent control and the minimization process associated with it may underlie motor equivalence in pointing. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Motor actions may result from minimization of the deflection of the actual body configuration from the centrally specified referent body configuration, in the limits of neuromuscular and environmental constraints. The minimization process may maintain reaching trajectory and accuracy regardless of the number of body segments involved (motor equivalence), as confirmed in this study of reaching from standing in young healthy individuals. Results suggest that the referent control process may underlie motor equivalence in reaching.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; arm movement; compensation; interjoint coordination; motor control; redundancy; synergy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27784802      PMCID: PMC5225951          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00292.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  51 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Analysis of "invariant characteristics" in the motor control of down's syndrome and normal subjects.

Authors:  W E Davis; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Threshold control of arm posture and movement adaptation to load.

Authors:  Martin Foisy; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Implicit learning and generalization of stretch response modulation in humans.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Mindy F Levin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load.

Authors:  D L Weeks; M P Aubert; A G Feldman; M F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence.

Authors:  D J S Mattos; M L Latash; E Park; J Kuhl; J P Scholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Movement reorganization to compensate for fatigue during sawing.

Authors:  Julie N Côté; Pierre A Mathieu; Mindy F Levin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli.

Authors:  Stefanie Richter; Petra Jansen-Osmann; Jürgen Konczak; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Referent control of the orientation of posture and movement in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Aditi A Mullick; Nicolas A Turpin; Szu-Chen Hsu; Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mild Stroke Affects Pointing Movements Made in Different Frames of Reference.

Authors:  Fariba Hasanbarani; Marc Aureli Pique Batalla; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.