Literature DB >> 12831732

Influence of the stiffness of bone defect implants on the mechanical conditions at the interface--a finite element analysis with contact.

U Simon1, P Augat, A Ignatius, L Claes.   

Abstract

The study focused on the influence of the implant material stiffness on stress distribution and micromotion at the interface of bone defect implants. We hypothesized that a low-stiffness implant with a modulus closer to that of the surrounding trabecular bone would yield a more homogeneous stress distribution and less micromotion at the interface with the bony bed. To prove this hypothesis we generated a three-dimensional, non-linear, anisotropic finite element (FE) model. The FE model corresponded to a previously developed animal model in sheep. A prismatic implant filled a standardized defect in the load-bearing area of the trabecular bone beneath the tibial plateau. The interface was described by face-to-face contact elements, which allow press fits, friction, sliding, and gapping. We assumed a physiological load condition and calculated contact pressures, shear stresses, and shear movements at the interface for two implants of different stiffness (titanium: E=110GPa; composite: E=2.2GPa). The FE model showed that the stress distribution was more homogeneous for the low-stiffness implant. The maximum pressure for the composite implant (2.1 MPa) was lower than for the titanium implant (5.6 MPa). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found more micromotion for the composite (up to 6 microm) than for the titanium implant (up to 4.5 microm). However, for both implants peak stresses and micromotion were in a range that predicts adequate conditions for the osseointegration. This was confirmed by the histological results from the animal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12831732     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00114-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Buttressing angle of the double-plating fixation of a distal radius fracture: a finite element study.

Authors:  Chun-Li Lin; Yu-Hao Lin; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Effect of Intramedullary Nailing Patterns on Interfragmentary Strain in a Mouse Femur Fracture: A Parametric Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Gregory B Lowen; Katherine A Garrett; Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Scott A Guelcher; Jonathan G Schoenecker; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The improved biological performance of a novel low elastic modulus implant.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Lei Shi; Ling Wang; Yonghong Duan; Wei Lei; Zhen Wang; Jing Li; Xiangli Fan; Xiaokang Li; Shujun Li; Zheng Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Osteogenic capacity of nanocrystalline bone cement in a weight-bearing defect at the ovine tibial metaphysis.

Authors:  Christoph Harms; Kai Helms; Tibor Taschner; Ioannis Stratos; Anita Ignatius; Thomas Gerber; Solvig Lenz; Stefan Rammelt; Brigitte Vollmar; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-06-15

6.  Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model.

Authors:  David S Ruppert; Ola LA Harrysson; Denis J Marcellin-Little; Seth Bollenbecker; Paul S Weinhold
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 7.  Fatigue Crack Growth and Fracture of Internal Fixation Materials in In Vivo Environments-A Review.

Authors:  Kailun Wu; Bin Li; Jiong Jiong Guo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.

Authors:  Jun Sun; Qiuan Wang; Dazhao Cai; Wenxiang Gu; Yiming Ma; Yang Sun; Yangyang Wei; Feng Yuan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Can medio-lateral baseplate position and load sharing induce asymptomatic local bone resorption of the proximal tibia? A finite element study.

Authors:  Bernardo Innocenti; Evelyn Truyens; Luc Labey; Pius Wong; Jan Victor; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Microarchitecture of titanium cylinders obtained by additive manufacturing does not influence osseointegration in the sheep.

Authors:  Louis Rony; Eric Aguado; Bruno Verlee; Florence Pascaretti-Grizon; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.