Literature DB >> 34802060

Effect of Intramedullary Nailing Patterns on Interfragmentary Strain in a Mouse Femur Fracture: A Parametric Finite Element Analysis.

Gregory B Lowen1, Katherine A Garrett2, Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge3, Sasidhar Uppuganti3, Scott A Guelcher4, Jonathan G Schoenecker5, Jeffry S Nyman6.   

Abstract

Delayed long bone fracture healing and nonunion continue to be a significant socioeconomic burden. While mechanical stimulation is known to be an important determinant of the bone repair process, understanding how the magnitude, mode, and commencement of interfragmentary strain (IFS) affect fracture healing can guide new therapeutic strategies to prevent delayed healing or nonunion. Mouse models provide a means to investigate the molecular and cellular aspects of fracture repair, yet there is only one commercially available, clinically-relevant, locking intramedullary nail (IMN) currently available for studying long bone fractures in rodents. Having access to alternative IMNs would allow a variety of mechanical environments at the fracture site to be evaluated, and the purpose of this proof-of-concept finite element analysis study is to identify which IMN design parameters have the largest impact on IFS in a murine transverse femoral osteotomy model. Using the dimensions of the clinically relevant IMN as a guide, the nail material, distance between interlocking screws, and clearance between the nail and endosteal surface were varied between simulations. Of these parameters, changing the nail material from stainless steel (SS) to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) had the largest impact on IFS. Reducing the distance between the proximal and distal interlocking screws substantially affected IFS only when nail modulus was low. Therefore, IMNs with low modulus (e.g., PEEK) can be used alongside commercially available SS nails to investigate the effect of initial IFS or stability on fracture healing with respect to different biological conditions of repair in rodents.
Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34802060      PMCID: PMC8822464          DOI: 10.1115/1.4053085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  85 in total

1.  Shear does not necessarily inhibit bone healing.

Authors:  N E Bishop; M van Rhijn; I Tami; R Corveleijn; E Schneider; K Ito
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Versus Titanium Tibial Intramedullary Nailing: A Preliminary Analysis and Results.

Authors:  Bruce Harris Ziran; Erin Kathleen O'Pry; Robert Mitchell Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of intramedullary nail with different materials in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Chenyan Wang; Xiaona Li; Weiyi Chen; Changjiang Wang; Yuan Guo; Hongmei Guo
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Improvement of the shear fixation stability of intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Tim Wehner; Rainer Penzkofer; Peter Augat; Lutz Claes; Ulrich Simon
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The course of bone healing is influenced by the initial shear fixation stability.

Authors:  H Schell; D R Epari; J P Kassi; H Bragulla; H J Bail; G N Duda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Stress Modulation of Fracture Fixation Implants.

Authors:  Michael J Beltran; Cory A Collinge; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Clinical outcomes of proximal femoral fractures treated with a novel carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Kazuma Takashima; Ichiro Nakahara; Keisuke Uemura; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Masaki Takao; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  A computational model to explore the role of angiogenic impairment on endochondral ossification during fracture healing.

Authors:  Adam OReilly; Kurt D Hankenson; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 9.  Mechanical regulation of bone regeneration: theories, models, and experiments.

Authors:  Duncan Colin Betts; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Fracture healing physiology and the quest for therapies for delayed healing and nonunion.

Authors:  Paul Kostenuik; Faisal M Mirza
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.