Literature DB >> 33902500

A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.

Jun Sun1, Qiuan Wang1, Dazhao Cai1, Wenxiang Gu1, Yiming Ma1, Yang Sun1, Yangyang Wei1, Feng Yuan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages.
METHODS: The finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure.
RESULTS: The ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage's and endplate-cage interface's stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages.
CONCLUSION: The application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage's stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Cervical spine; Finite element analysis; Fusion cage

Year:  2021        PMID: 33902500     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  32 in total

1.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks.

Authors:  R B CLOWARD
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Authors:  Sharon C Yson; Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Rainier G Santos
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.

Authors:  Matti Scholz; Philipp Schleicher; Simone Pabst; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Domagoj Coric; Todd Albert
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-03-25

5.  Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kirsten Schmieder; Markus Wolzik-Grossmann; Ioannis Pechlivanis; Martin Engelhardt; Martin Scholz; Albrecht Harders
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-06

6.  Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Tien V Le; Ali A Baaj; Elias Dakwar; Clinton J Burkett; Gisela Murray; Donald A Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Takashi Asazuma; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Hiroki Yasuoka; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Anterior Techniques in Managing Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Lily H Kim; Marissa D'Souza; Allen L Ho; Arjun V Pendharkar; Eric S Sussman; Paymon Rezaii; Atman Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-14

9.  Integral Fixation Titanium/Polyetheretherketone Cages for Cervical Arthrodesis: Evolution of Cage Design and Early Radiological Outcomes and Fusion Rates.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Matthew H Pelletier; Prashanth J Rao; Wen Jie Choy; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant.

Authors:  G W Bagby
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Middle Aged and Elderly.

Authors:  Shiyuan Wan; Bin Xue; Yanhao Xiong
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.