Literature DB >> 12827200

The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict.

Oliver Y Martin1, David J Hosken.   

Abstract

Classical population-genetics theory suggests that reproductive isolation will evolve fastest in small isolated populations. In contrast, recent theory suggests that divergence should occur fastest in larger allopatric populations. The rationale behind this is that sexual conflict, potentially the strongest driver of speciation, is greater in larger, higher-density populations. This idea is highly controversial and has little experimental support. Here we show, using replicate fly populations with varying levels of sexual conflict, that larger, more dense populations with more sexual conflict diverged to a greater degree than small populations with relaxed conflict. This result strongly suggests that speciation can occur rapidly in large populations through increased sexual conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827200     DOI: 10.1038/nature01752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  55 in total

1.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles.

Authors:  Johanna Rönn; Mari Katvala; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Does reproductive isolation evolve faster in larger populations via sexually antagonistic coevolution?

Authors:  L Gay; P E Eady; R Vasudev; D J Hosken; T Tregenza
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies.

Authors:  D J Hosken; O Y Martin; S Wigby; T Chapman; D J Hodgson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Sexual conflict predicts morphology and behavior in two species of penduline tits.

Authors:  René E van Dijk; Akos Pogány; Jan Komdeur; Penn Lloyd; Tamás Székely
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Experience matters: females use smell to select experienced males for paternal care.

Authors:  Nichola Fletcher; Ellen J Storey; Magnus Johnson; Donald J Reish; Jörg D Hardege
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.