Literature DB >> 16627285

Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation.

Patrik Nosil1, Bernard J Crespi.   

Abstract

Speciation can involve the evolution of 'cryptic' reproductive isolation that occurs after copulation but before hybrid offspring are produced. Because such cryptic barriers to gene exchange involve post-mating sexual interactions, analyses of their evolution have focused on sexual conflict or traditional sexual selection. Here, we show that ecological divergence between populations of herbivorous walking sticks is integral to the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation. Low female fitness following between-population mating can reduce gene exchange between populations, thus acting as a form of cryptic isolation. Female walking sticks show reduced oviposition rate and lower lifetime fecundity following between-population versus within-population mating, but only for mating between populations using different host-plant species. Our results indicate that even inherently sexual forms of reproductive isolation can evolve as a by-product of ecological divergence and that post-mating sexual interactions do not necessarily evolve independently of the ecological environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627285      PMCID: PMC1560232          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins.

Authors:  Willie J Swanson; Victor D Vacquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Bernard J Crespi; Cristina P Sandoval
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Erin Cameron; Troy Day
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology.

Authors:  Daniel J Funk; Kenneth E Filchak; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict.

Authors:  Oliver Y Martin; David J Hosken
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex.

Authors:  C S Price; C H Kim; C J Gronlund; J A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  17 in total

1.  Does a predatory insect contribute to the divergence between cave- and surface-adapted fish populations?

Authors:  Michael Tobler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Asymmetric isolating barriers between different microclimatic environments caused by low immigrant survival.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; John T Waller; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cryptic gametic interactions confer both conspecific and heterospecific advantages in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.

Authors:  Merrill A Peterson; Erica L Larson; Margaret Brassil; Kati J Buckingham; Danielle Juárez; Joseph Deas; Donna Mangloña; Michael A White; Jonathan Maslan; Andrew Schweitzer; Kirsten J Monsen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Adaptive zones shape the magnitude of premating reproductive isolation in Timema stick insects.

Authors:  Moritz Muschick; Víctor Soria-Carrasco; Jeffrey L Feder; Zach Gompert; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Components of reproductive isolation between North American pheromone strains of the European corn borer.

Authors:  Erik B Dopman; Paul S Robbins; Abby Seaman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Ecological selection as the cause and sexual differentiation as the consequence of species divergence?

Authors:  Elen Oneal; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective.

Authors:  Tovi Lehmann; Abdoulaye Diabate
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Parallel patterns of morphological and behavioral variation among host-associated populations of two gall wasp species.

Authors:  Scott P Egan; Glen R Hood; Gabriel DeVela; James R Ott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Noncompetitive Gametic Isolation between Sibling Species of Cricket: A Hypothesized Link between Within-Population Incompatibility and Reproductive Isolation between Species.

Authors:  Jeremy L Marshall; Nicholas Dirienzo
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.