Literature DB >> 22975793

Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment.

Trine Kjær1, Mickael Bech, Christian Kronborg, Morten Raun Mørkbak.   

Abstract

At present there are no nephrology facilities in Greenland. Greenlandic patients with renal failure needing dialysis thus have to travel to Denmark to obtain treatment. For patients in haemodialysis this necessitates a permanent residence in Denmark. Our study was aimed at examining Greenlanders' preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland at Queen Ingrid's Hospital in Nuuk, and to estimate the associated change in welfare. Preferences were elicited using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). A random sample of 500 individuals of the general population was sent a postal questionnaire in which they were asked to consider the trade-offs of establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland as opposed to the current situation. This involved trading off the benefits of having such facilities in their home country against the costs of the intervention. Besides including a payment attribute described in terms of incremental tax payment, the DCE included two interventions attributes related to (1) the organisation of labour, and (2) the physical settings of the patients. Respondents succeeded in answering the DCE despite cultural and linguistic disparity. We found that all the included attributes had a significant effect on respondents' choices, and that respondents' answers to the DCE were in keeping with their values as stated in the questionnaire. DCE data was analyzed using a random parameter logit model reparametrized in willingness-to-pay space. The results showed that establishing facilities in Greenland were preferred to the current treatment in Denmark. The welfare estimate from the DCE, at DKK 18.74 million, exceeds the estimated annual costs of establishing treatment facilities for patients with chronic renal failure. Given the estimated confidence interval this result seems robust. Establishing facilities in Greenland therefore would appear to be welfare-improving, deriving positive net benefits. Despite the relatively narrow policy focus, we believe that our findings provide some insight into individuals' preferences for decentralization of public services and on citizens' views of 'self-governance' that go beyond the case of Greenland. More generally, this paper illustrates how DCE can be applied successfully to developing countries with culturally, demographically, and geographically distinct features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22975793     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-012-0418-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  8 in total

1.  Health expectancy in Greenland.

Authors:  K M Iburg; H Brønnum-Hansen; P Bjerregaard
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Jan Abel Olsen; Paul Menzel; Jeff Richardson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Elizabeth Savage
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1).

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2).

Authors:  J M C Santos Silva
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Effects coding in discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Mickael Bech; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The use of willingness to pay to assess public preferences towards the fortification of foodstuffs with folic acid.

Authors:  Simon Dixon; Phil Shackley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.

Authors:  Lindsay J Mangham; Kara Hanson; Barbara McPake
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 3.344

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzana Karim; Benjamin M Craig; Caroline Vass; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.558

Review 2.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.