Literature DB >> 12821852

Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging.

Richard Frayne1, Bradley G Goodyear, Peter Dickhoff, M Louis Lauzon, Robert J Sevick.   

Abstract

MR imaging at very high field (3.0 T) is a significant new clinical tool in the modern neuroradiological armamentarium. In this report, we summarize our 40-month experience in performing clinical neuroradiological examinations at 3.0 T and review the relevant technical issues. We report on these issues and, where appropriate, their solutions. Issues examined include: increased SNR, larger chemical shifts, additional problems associated with installation of these scanners, challenges in designing and obtaining appropriate clinical imaging coils, greater acoustic noise, increased power deposition, changes in relaxation rates and susceptibility effects, and issues surrounding the safety and compatibility of implanted devices. Some of the these technical factors are advantageous (eg, increased signal-to-noise ratio), some are detrimental (eg, installation, coil design and development, acoustic noise, power deposition, device compatibility, and safety), and a few have both benefits and disadvantages (eg, changes in relaxation, chemical shift, and susceptibility). Fortunately solutions have been developed or are currently under development, by us and by others, for nearly all of these challenges. A short series of 1.5 T and 3.0 T patient images are also presented to illustrate the potential diagnostic benefits of scanning at higher field strengths. In summary, by paying appropriate attention to the discussed technical issues, high-quality neuro-imaging of patients is possible at 3.0 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821852     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000073442.88269.c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  48 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  [Clinical MR at 3 Tesla: current status].

Authors:  K T Baudendistel; J T Heverhagen; M V Knopp
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The high-field-strength curmudgeon.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Significance of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement for the differential diagnosis of multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and Parkinson's disease: evaluation by 3.0-T MR imaging.

Authors:  Kazumichi Tsukamoto; Eiji Matsusue; Yoshiko Kanasaki; Suguru Kakite; Shinya Fujii; Toshio Kaminou; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Does high-field MR imaging have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic mr imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  M P Wattjes; M Harzheim; C K Kuhl; J Gieseke; S Schmidt; L Klotz; T Klockgether; H H Schild; G G Lutterbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Giuseppe M Giannatempo; Teresa Popolizio; Domenico Catapano; Simona Bonavita; Nicola Maggialetti; Michela Tosetti; Ugo Salvolini; Vincenzo A d'Angelo; Giocchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Evaluation of MR imaging compatibility of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device.

Authors:  Jens O Heidenreich; Rüdiger Stendel; Mario Brock; Karl-Jürgen Wolf; Andreas M Schilling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.