INTRODUCTION: The clinical differentiation of Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may be challenging, especially in their early stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement to distinguish among these degenerative disorders. METHODS: Twenty-five MSA, 20 PSP, and 17 PD patients and 18 healthy controls were retrospectively studied. Axial diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images were obtained using a 3-T MR system. Regions of interest (ROIs) were precisely placed in the midbrain, pons, putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, thalamus, superior cerebellar peduncle, middle cerebellar peduncle, cerebellar white matter, and cerebellar dentate nucleus, and the regional ADC (rADC) value was calculated in each ROI. RESULTS: In MSA, rADC values in the pons, middle cerebellar peduncle, cerebellar white matter, and cerebellar dentate nucleus were significantly higher than in PSP, PD, and controls. Furthermore, rADC values in the posterior putamen were significantly higher in MSA than in PSP and controls. In PSP, rADC values were significantly higher in the globus pallidus and midbrain than in MSA, PD, and controls. Furthermore, rADC values in the caudate nucleus and superior cerebellar peduncle were significantly higher in PSP than in MSA and controls. In PD, there were no significant differences in the rADC values compared to in MSA, PSP, and controls in all regions. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of rADC values in characteristic lesions in MSA, PSP, and PD by placing ROIs using 3-T systems can provide useful additional information for differentiating these disorders.
INTRODUCTION: The clinical differentiation of Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may be challenging, especially in their early stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement to distinguish among these degenerative disorders. METHODS: Twenty-five MSA, 20 PSP, and 17 PDpatients and 18 healthy controls were retrospectively studied. Axial diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images were obtained using a 3-T MR system. Regions of interest (ROIs) were precisely placed in the midbrain, pons, putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, thalamus, superior cerebellar peduncle, middle cerebellar peduncle, cerebellar white matter, and cerebellar dentate nucleus, and the regional ADC (rADC) value was calculated in each ROI. RESULTS: In MSA, rADC values in the pons, middle cerebellar peduncle, cerebellar white matter, and cerebellar dentate nucleus were significantly higher than in PSP, PD, and controls. Furthermore, rADC values in the posterior putamen were significantly higher in MSA than in PSP and controls. In PSP, rADC values were significantly higher in the globus pallidus and midbrain than in MSA, PD, and controls. Furthermore, rADC values in the caudate nucleus and superior cerebellar peduncle were significantly higher in PSP than in MSA and controls. In PD, there were no significant differences in the rADC values compared to in MSA, PSP, and controls in all regions. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of rADC values in characteristic lesions in MSA, PSP, and PD by placing ROIs using 3-T systems can provide useful additional information for differentiating these disorders.
Authors: Klaus Seppi; Michael F H Schocke; Katherina J Mair; Regina Esterhammer; Christoph Scherfler; Felix Geser; Christian Kremser; Sylvia Boesch; Werner Jaschke; Werner Poewe; Gregor K Wenning Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-01-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Giovanni Rizzo; Paolo Martinelli; David Manners; Cesa Scaglione; Caterina Tonon; Pietro Cortelli; Emil Malucelli; Sabina Capellari; Claudia Testa; Piero Parchi; Pasquale Montagna; Bruno Barbiroli; Raffaele Lodi Journal: Brain Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Trina Mitchell; Derek B Archer; Winston T Chu; Stephen A Coombes; Song Lai; Bradley J Wilkes; Nikolaus R McFarland; Michael S Okun; Mieniecia L Black; Ellen Herschel; Tanya Simuni; Cynthia Comella; Tao Xie; Hong Li; Todd B Parrish; Ajay S Kurani; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nicholas W Sterling; Guangwei Du; Mechelle M Lewis; Steven Swavely; Lan Kong; Martin Styner; Xuemei Huang Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Christopher W Hess; Edward Ofori; Umer Akbar; Michael S Okun; David E Vaillancourt Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Janey Prodoehl; Hong Li; Peggy J Planetta; Christopher G Goetz; Kathleen M Shannon; Ruth Tangonan; Cynthia L Comella; Tanya Simuni; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Sue Leurgans; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: I Hwang; C-H Sohn; K M Kang; B S Jeon; H-J Kim; S H Choi; T J Yun; J-H Kim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825