Literature DB >> 12819841

Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke.

M C Cirstea1, A B Mitnitski, A G Feldman, M F Levin.   

Abstract

A technique is described that characterizes the dynamics of the interjoint coordination of arm reaching movements in healthy subjects (n=10) and in patients who had sustained a left-sided cerebrovascular accident (n=18). All participants were right-handed. Data from the affected right arm of patients with stroke were compared with those from the right arm of healthy subjects. Seated subjects made 25 pointing movements in a single session. Movements were made from an initial target located ipsilaterally to the right arm beside the body, to a final target located in front of the subject in the contralateral arm workspace. Kinematic data from the finger, wrist, elbow, both shoulders and sternum were recorded in three dimensions at 200 Hz with an optical tracking system. Analysis of interjoint coordination was based on the patterns of temporal delay between rotations at two adjacent joints (shoulder and elbow). The data were reduced to a single graph (Temporal Coordination or TC index) integrating the essential temporal characteristics of joint movement (the angular displacements, velocities and timing). TC segments, duration and amplitude, were analysed. The analysis was sensitive to the differences in interjoint coordination between healthy subjects and patients with arm motor deficits. In patients, the temporal coordination between elbow and shoulder movements was disrupted from the middle to the end of the reach. More specifically, in mid-reach, all patients had difficulty coordinating elbow flexion with shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, patients with severe arm hemiparesis had difficulty changing elbow movement direction from flexion to extension and in coordinating this change with shoulder movement. At the end of the reach, patients with severe hemiparesis had deficits in the execution of elbow extension while all patients had impaired coordination of elbow extension and shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, active ranges of joint motions were significantly decreased in the stroke compared to the healthy subjects. Finally, TC analysis revealed significant relationships between specific aspects of disrupted interjoint coordination and the level of motor impairment, suggesting that it may be a useful tool in the identification of specific movement coordination deficits in neurological impaired populations that can be targeted in treatment for arm motor recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819841     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1438-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data.

Authors:  J A Kelso; K G Holt; P Rubin; P N Kugler
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Buchanan; S A Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; M F Levin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery.

Authors:  V M Parker; D T Wade; R Langton Hewer
Journal:  Int Rehabil Med       Date:  1986

5.  A longitudinal study of intralimb coordination in the first year of independent walking: a dynamical systems analysis.

Authors:  J E Clark; S J Phillips
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1993-08

6.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis.

Authors:  S J Fellows; C Kaus; A F Thilmann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Impaired activation pattern in antagonistic elbow muscles of patients with spastic hemiparesis: contribution to movement disorder.

Authors:  M A el-Abd; I K Ibrahim; V Dietz
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06

9.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  44 in total

1.  Need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke.

Authors:  Stacey L DeJong; Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Movement Imitation via an Abstract Trajectory Representation in Dorsal Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Steven A Jax; Louisa L Smith; Laurel J Buxbaum; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tina M Stoeckmann; Katherine J Sullivan; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-14

4.  Robotic therapy for chronic stroke: general recovery of impairment or improved task-specific skill?

Authors:  Tomoko Kitago; Jeff Goldsmith; Michelle Harran; Leslie Kane; Jessica Berard; Sylvia Huang; Sophia L Ryan; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer; Vincent S Huang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-assisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace.

Authors:  L Dipietro; H I Krebs; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; S T Mernoff; S E Fasoli; N Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Timing variability of reach trajectories in left versus right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; Geetanjali Gera; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Person-specific changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity functional gains after stroke.

Authors:  Stacey L DeJong; Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Joanne M Wagner; Amy J Bastian; Qingli Hu; Dorothy F Edwards; Shirley A Sahrmann; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; A Ptito; M F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications.

Authors:  Theresa M Sukal; Michael D Ellis; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.