Literature DB >> 21920508

Timing variability of reach trajectories in left versus right hemisphere stroke.

Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas1, Geetanjali Gera, John Peter Scholz.   

Abstract

This study investigated trajectory timing variability in right and left stroke survivors and healthy controls when reaching to a centrally located target under a fixed target condition or when the target could suddenly change position after reach onset. Trajectory timing variability was investigated with a novel method based on dynamic programming that identifies the steps required to time warp one trial's acceleration time series to match that of a reference trial. Greater trajectory timing variability of both hand and joint motions was found for the paretic arm of stroke survivors compared to their non-paretic arm or either arm of controls. Overall, the non-paretic left arm of the LCVA group and the left arm of controls had higher timing variability than the non-paretic right arm of the RCVA group and right arm of controls. The shoulder and elbow joint warping costs were consistent predictors of the hand's warping cost for both left and right arms only in the LCVA group, whereas the relationship between joint and hand warping costs was relatively weak in control subjects and less consistent across arms in the RCVA group. These results suggest that the left hemisphere may be more involved in trajectory timing, although the results may be confounded by skill differences between the arms in these right hand dominant participants. On the other hand, arm differences did not appear to be related to differences in targeting error. The paretic left arm of the RCVA exhibited greater trajectory timing variability than the paretic right arm of the LCVA group. This difference was highly correlated with the level of impairment of the arms. Generally, the effect of target uncertainty resulted in slightly greater trajectory timing variability for all participants. The results are discussed in light of previous studies of hemispheric differences in the control of reaching, in particular, left hemisphere specialization for temporal control of reaching movements.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920508      PMCID: PMC3195887          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  52 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Handedness and hemispheric asymmetry in the control of movements.

Authors:  J I Todor; T Doane
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Submovement changes characterize generalization of motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Laura Dipietro; Hermano I Krebs; Susan E Fasoli; Bruce T Volpe; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Hemispheric asymmetry of movement.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D L Harrington
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Upper extremity control in adults post stroke with mild residual impairment.

Authors:  P S Pohl; C W Luchies; J Stoker-Yates; P W Duncan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke.

Authors:  L Dipietro; H I Krebs; S E Fasoli; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; John P Scholz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Coordination of muscles to control the footpath during over-ground walking in neurologically intact individuals and stroke survivors.

Authors:  Shraddha Srivastava; Pei-Chun Kao; Darcy S Reisman; Jill S Higginson; John P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural circuits activated by error amplification and haptic guidance training techniques during performance of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Milot; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Louis-David Beaulieu; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.