Literature DB >> 8359130

Impaired activation pattern in antagonistic elbow muscles of patients with spastic hemiparesis: contribution to movement disorder.

M A el-Abd1, I K Ibrahim, V Dietz.   

Abstract

Surface electromyographic "EMG" activity in biceps brachii (agonist muscle) and triceps brachii (antagonist muscle) as well as the discharge behaviour of motor units "MUs" (needle recording) in biceps brachii muscle were recorded during slow (0.33 Hz) and fast (0.66 Hz) voluntary elbow flexion movements (auditory matching task) in fifty patients with spastic hemiplegia. In the spastic limbs, a long lasting, small amplitude tonic co-contraction of antagonist muscles was seen during slow flexions (SF) in 29 cases. This effect was strongest during the fast elbow flexion movements (FF). In 33 patients a triphasic pattern of muscle activation was observed on the unaffected side but not on the spastic side. The amplitude of the agonist surface EMG was significantly reduced and the amplitudes of the MU potentials recruited during maximal effort were generally smaller on the spastic side compared to the unaffected side. The agonist-antagonist activation pattern was analysed with respect to three clinically identifiable functional recovery stages of voluntary movements in the spastic limbs, namely synergistic, isolated and useful movements. The MU amplitudes and the amplitude of the surface EMG activity in the agonist muscle recorded during FF movements became significantly larger whereas the amplitude of the antagonist tonic activity became smaller with increasing functional recovery of the limb. It is concluded that impaired recruitment of type II motor units in the agonist muscles and the inability to selectively activate the agonist muscle contribute to the deficit in motor performance in spastic paresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0301-150X


  6 in total

1.  Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis.

Authors:  Randall F Beer; Julius P A Dewald; Michelle L Dawson; W Zev Rymer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Factors that influence muscle weakness following stroke and their clinical implications: a critical review.

Authors:  Vicki Gray; Charles L Rice; S Jayne Garland
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tina M Stoeckmann; Katherine J Sullivan; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-14

4.  Stretch-sensitive paresis and effort perception in hemiparesis.

Authors:  Maria Vinti; Nicolas Bayle; Emilie Hutin; David Burke; Jean-Michel Gracies
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Pratik K Mutha; Andrzej Przybyla; Kathleen Y Haaland; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; A B Mitnitski; A G Feldman; M F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.