Literature DB >> 16680447

Validity of pressure pain thresholds in female workers with and without recurrent low back pain.

Peter Schenk1, Thomas Laeubli, Andreas Klipstein.   

Abstract

Recurrent low back pain (LBP) is a common pain condition in elderly workers in a variety of occupations, but little is known about its origin and the mechanisms leading to an often disabling sensation of pain that may be persistent or intermittent. In the present study we evaluated the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in subjects suffering from recurrent LBP, as well as in healthy controls, to investigate if recurrent LBP is associated with an increased sensitivity of the muscular and ligamentous structures located on the lower back. One hundred and six female workers, aged between 45 and 62 years and working either in administrative or nursing professions were examined. The subjects were classified into LBP cases and controls based on the Nordic questionnaire. Subjects indicating 8-30 or more days with LBP during the past 12 months were graded as cases. PPTs were measured on 12 points (six on each side of the body) expected to be relevant for LBP (paravertebral muscles, musculus quadratus lumborum, os ilium, iliolumbar ligament, musculus piriformis and greater trochanter), as well as on a reference point (middle of the forehead) using a digital dolorimeter. The PPTs on all points on the lower back highly correlated with each other and a high internal consistency was found with a Cronbach alpha coefficient > 0.95. There was a moderate and significant correlation of the PPT on the forehead with the PPT on the lower back with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.49. In LBP cases from administrative professions, the PPT on the forehead was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The PPT on the lower back did not significantly differ between the four groups studied, namely nurses and administrative workers with and without recurrent LBP. These results give evidence that recurrent LBP is not associated with an altered sensitivity of the muscular and myofascial tissues in the lumbar region. Furthermore, they raise questions about the value of reference point measurements in recurrent LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16680447      PMCID: PMC2200678          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0124-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Pain-sensitivity tests; the pressure algometer.

Authors:  K D KEELE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1954-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Bart Koes; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold.

Authors:  Andrew A Fischer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity.

Authors:  John L Reeves; Bernadette Jaeger; Steven B Graff-Radford
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Impact of age, gender and cognitive functioning on pain perception.

Authors:  Gisèle Pickering; Didier Jourdan; Alain Eschalier; Claude Dubray
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.140

6.  Fear of movement/(re)injury, disability and participation in acute low back pain.

Authors:  Ilse E J Swinkels-Meewisse; Jeffrey Roelofs; André L M Verbeek; Rob A B Oostendorp; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  A Busch; C L Schachter; P M Peloso; C Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

8.  Associations of psychosocial and individual factors with three different categories of back disorder among nursing staff.

Authors:  Francesco S Violante; Marina Fiori; Cristiana Fiorentini; Alessandro Risi; Giacomo Garagnani; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefano Mattioli
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Thorsten Giesecke; Richard H Gracely; Masilo A B Grant; Alf Nachemson; Frank Petzke; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-02

10.  The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in Norwegian nurses' aides.

Authors:  Willy Eriksen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Breast Cancer EDGE Task Force Outcomes: Clinical Measures of Pain.

Authors:  Shana Harrington; Laura Gilchrist; Antoinette Sander
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2014

3.  Central sensitization and changes in conditioned pain modulation in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a case-control study.

Authors:  Juliana Barbosa Corrêa; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira; Kathleen A Sluka; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pressure pain sensitivity maps, self-reported musculoskeletal disorders and sickness absence among cleaners.

Authors:  Asbjørn Thalund Binderup; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Effects of the carrier frequency of interferential current on pain modulation in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Juliana Barbosa Corrêa; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira; Kathleen A Sluka; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Frequency and severity of low back pain in nurses working in intensive care units and influential factors.

Authors:  Ozlem Ovayolu; Nimet Ovayolu; Mehtap Genc; Nilgun Col-Araz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Intra-session absolute and relative reliability of pressure pain thresholds in the low back region of vine-workers: ffect of the number of trials.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Madeline Luiza Ferreira Pivovarsky; Fernanda Gaideski; Rafael Michel de Macedo; Raciele Ivandra Guarda Korelo; Luiz César Guarita-Souza; Richard Eloin Liebano; Ana Carolina Brandt de Macedo
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-12-17

9.  Efficacy of the addition of interferential current to Pilates method in patients with low back pain: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuri Rafael dos Santos Franco; Richard Eloin Liebano; Katherinne Ferro Moura; Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira; Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto; Matheus Oliveira Santos; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.