Literature DB >> 7667661

Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children.

S C Harth1, Y H Thong.   

Abstract

We interviewed 64 parents by questionnaire after completion of a clinical trial involving their children for their perceptions and attitudes about informed consent. The results show that only a small minority realised that drug trials are designed to assess not only efficacy but safety as well. More worrisome was the majority of parents who felt that drug trials conducted by hospitals are of no or low risks. Moreover, a significant minority offered the view that the strict informed consent procedures we followed were unnecessary because they would do what the doctor advised. Even more worrisome was the small percentage of parents who realised that a signed consent form was primarily meant to protect their rights, and only one-third of the parents knew of their right to withdraw their child unconditionally from the trial at any time. These findings suggest that there may be significant attitudinal barriers to parental understanding of the informed consent process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7667661     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00412-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study.

Authors:  E Burgess; N Singhal; H Amin; D D McMillan; H Devrome
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

4.  Neonatal research: the parental perspective.

Authors:  B J Stenson; J-C Becher; N McIntosh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Parent participation and physician-parent communication during informed consent in child leukemia.

Authors:  Melissa Cousino; Rebecca Hazen; Amy Yamokoski; Victoria Miller; Stephen Zyzanski; Dennis Drotar; Eric Kodish
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

7.  Caregivers' Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Dorothy Helen Boyd; Yinan Zhang; Lee Smith; Lee Adam; L Foster Page; W M Thomson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Proxy consent in neonatal care--goal-directed or procedure-specific?

Authors:  Donal Manning
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

9.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Clinical trials of drugs used off-label in neonates: ethical issues and alternative study designs.

Authors:  Sanjiv B Amin; Michael P McDermott; Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.