Literature DB >> 20569149

Parents' views of involvement in concurrent research with their neonates.

Frances Rieth Ward1.   

Abstract

It would be useful to researchers and bioethicists to know more about parents' decision processes and emotional state during the time they are deciding whether to enroll their infant in a clinical trial. The aim of this research study was to discover whether parents who had been previously asked to enroll their neonates in clinical trials would have found concurrent research about their decision-making overly burdensome. Twenty-seven parents of critically ill neonates who had been approached for their child's research participation in a clinical trial were asked what they believed about the potential burden or value of being interviewed during the time of research decision-making about their infant's participation. For this qualitative descriptive study, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. Participants considered concurrent research acceptable for them but potentially problematic for others. Theories of risk preferences and social comparison might explain these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20569149      PMCID: PMC3102309          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  30 in total

1.  Neonatal research: the parental perspective.

Authors:  B J Stenson; J-C Becher; N McIntosh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  The challenge of informed consent in neonatal research.

Authors:  Ernest N Kraybill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"?

Authors:  S Mason
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Neonatal nurses and issues in research ethics.

Authors:  N Cunningham; S Hutchinson
Journal:  Neonatal Netw       Date:  1990-04

6.  Effectiveness of an intervention to improve parent-professional collaboration in neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  Joy H Penticuff; Kristopher L Arheart
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

7.  The qualitative research audit trail: a complex collection of documentation.

Authors:  B L Rodgers; K V Cowles
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials.

Authors:  J A Zupancic; P Gillie; D L Streiner; J L Watts; B Schmidt
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: is it stressful? Is it helpful?

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Diane L Fairclough; Pam Wolfe; Linda L Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-11

10.  Benefits of participating in research interviews.

Authors:  S A Hutchinson; M E Wilson; H S Wilson
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1994
View more
  4 in total

1.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  A pilot study to assess the safety, efficacy and ease of use of a novel hearing protection device for hospitalized neonates.

Authors:  Michael J Balsan; Jeanne Burns; Fred Kimock; Emily Hirsch; Andrew Unger; Richard Telesco; Elisabeth Bloch-Salisbury
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer Degl; Ronald Ariagno; Judy Aschner; Sandra Beauman; Wakako Eklund; Elissa Faro; Hiroko Iwami; Yamile Jackson; Carole Kenner; Ivone Kim; Agnes Klein; Mary Short; Keira Sorrells; Mark A Turner; Robert Ward; Scott Winiecki; Christina Bucci-Rechtweg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  A Delphi process to optimize quality and performance of drug evaluation in neonates.

Authors:  Frederic Legrand; Rym Boulkedid; Valery Elie; Stephanie Leroux; Elizabeth Valls; Adolfo Valls-i-Soler; Johannes N Van den Anker; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.