Literature DB >> 12815644

Three-dimensional method for comparing in vivo interventional MR images of thermally ablated tissue with tissue response.

Michael S Breen1, Tanya L Lancaster, Roee S Lazebnik, Sherif G Nour, Jonathan S Lewin, David L Wilson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor radio-frequency (RF) ablation treatments by comparing MR images of thermal lesions to histologically assayed cellular damage. We developed a new methodology using three-dimensional registration for making spatial correlations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A low-field, open MRI system was used to guide an ablation probe into rabbit thigh muscle and acquire MR volumes after ablation. After fixation, we sliced and photographed the tissue at 3-mm intervals, using a specially designed apparatus, to obtain a volume of tissue images. Histologic samples were digitized using a video microscopy system. For our three-dimensional registration method, we used the tissue images as the reference, and registered histology and MR images to them using two different computer alignment steps. First, the MR volume was aligned to the volume of tissue images by registering needle fiducials placed near the tissue of interest. Second, we registered the histology images with the tissue images using a two-dimensional warping technique that aligned internal features and the outside boundary of histology and tissue images.
RESULTS: The MR and histology images were very well aligned, and registration accuracy, determined from displacement of needle fiducials, was 1.32 +/- 0.39 mm (mean +/- SD), which compared favorably to the MR voxel dimensions (0.70 mm in-plane and 3.0 mm thick). A preliminary comparison of MR and tissue response showed that the region inside the elliptical hyperintense rim in MR closely corresponds to the region of necrosis as established by histology, with a mean absolute distance between MR and histology boundaries of 1.17 mm, slightly smaller than the mean registration error. The MR region slightly overestimated the region of necrosis, with a mean signed distance between boundaries of 0.85 mm.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that our methodology can be used to achieve three-dimensional registration of histology and in vivo MR images. In MR lesion images, the inner border of the hyperintense region corresponds to the border of irreversible cell damage. This is good evidence that during RF ablation treatments, iMRI lesion images can be used for real-time feedback. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12815644     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Fiducial markers for combined 3-dimensional mass spectrometric and optical tissue imaging.

Authors:  Kamila Chughtai; Lu Jiang; Tiffany R Greenwood; Ivo Klinkert; Erika R Amstalden van Hove; Ron M A Heeren; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A methodology for registration of a histological slide and in vivo MRI volume based on optimizing mutual information.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Bradford A Moffat; Kyle K Kuszpit; Peyton L Bland; Paul E Mckeever; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 3.  Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images.

Authors:  Li Hong Chen; Henry Ho; Richie Lazaro; Choon Hua Thng; John Yuen; Wan Sing Ng; Chris Cheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Assessment of acute thermal damage volumes in muscle using magnetization-prepared 3D T2 -weighted imaging following MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Robert M Staruch; Joris Nofiele; Jamie Walker; Chenchen Bing; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; April Bailey; Young-Sun Kim; Avneesh Chhabra; Dennis Burns; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Comparing deflection measurements of a magnetically steerable catheter using optical imaging and MRI.

Authors:  Prasheel Lillaney; Curtis Caton; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Leland Evans; Maythem Saeed; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Focal Prostate Ablation.

Authors:  Sherif G Nour
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Validation of automatic target volume definition as demonstrated for 11C-choline PET/CT of human prostate cancer using multi-modality fusion techniques.

Authors:  Hyunjin Park; Charles R Meyer; David Wood; Asra Khan; Rajal Shah; Hero Hussain; Javed Siddiqui; Jongbum Seo; Thomas Chenevert; Morand Piert
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Registration methodology for histological sections and in vivo imaging of human prostate.

Authors:  Hyunjin Park; Morand R Piert; Asra Khan; Rajal Shah; Hero Hussain; Javed Siddiqui; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Facilitating tumor functional assessment by spatially relating 3D tumor histology and in vivo MRI: image registration approach.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Joost C Haeck; Karin Bol; Stefan Klein; Sandra T van Tiel; Piotr A Wielepolski; Marion de Jong; Wiro J Niessen; Monique Bernsen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Atherosclerotic plaque component segmentation in combined carotid MRI and CTA data incorporating class label uncertainty.

Authors:  Arna van Engelen; Wiro J Niessen; Stefan Klein; Harald C Groen; Hence J M Verhagen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Aad van der Lugt; Marleen de Bruijne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.