Literature DB >> 28067975

Assessment of acute thermal damage volumes in muscle using magnetization-prepared 3D T2 -weighted imaging following MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Robert M Staruch1,2, Joris Nofiele1, Jamie Walker3, Chenchen Bing1, Ananth J Madhuranthakam1,4, April Bailey1, Young-Sun Kim5, Avneesh Chhabra1, Dennis Burns3, Rajiv Chopra1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetization-prepared 3D T2 -weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of acute tissue changes produced during ablative MR high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) exposures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical MR-HIFU system (3T) was used to generate thermal lesions (n = 24) in the skeletal muscles of three pigs. T1 -weighted, 2D T2 -weighted, and magnetization-prepared 3D T2 -weighted sequences were acquired before and after therapy to evaluate tissue changes following ablation. Tissues were harvested shortly after imaging, fixed in formalin, and gross-sectioned. Select lesions were processed into whole-mount sections. Lesion dimensions for each imaging sequence (length, width) and for gross sections (diameter of lesion core and rim) were assessed by three physicists. Contrast-to-background ratio between lesions and surrounding muscle was compared.
RESULTS: Lesion dimensions on T1 and 2D T2 -weighted imaging sequences were well correlated (R2 ∼0.7). The contrast-to-background ratio between lesion and surrounding muscle was 7.4 ± 2.4 for the magnetization-prepared sequence versus 1.7 ± 0.5 for a conventional 2D T2 -weighted acquisition, and 7.0 ± 2.9 for a contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted sequence. Compared with diameter measured on gross pathology, all imaging sequences overestimated the lesion core by 22-33%, and underestimated the lesion rim by 6-13%.
CONCLUSION: After MR-HIFU exposures, measurements of the acute thermal damage patterns in muscle using a magnetization-prepared 3D T2 -weighted imaging sequence correlate with 2D T2 -weighted and contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted imaging, and all agree well with histology. The magnetization-prepared sequence offers positive tissue contrast and does not require IV contrast agents, and may provide a noninvasive imaging evaluation of the region of acute thermal injury at multiple times during HIFU procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:354-364.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIFU; MRI; high-intensity focused ultrasound; preclinical; thermal ablation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28067975      PMCID: PMC5502206          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  40 in total

1.  Assessment of thermal tissue ablation with MR elastography.

Authors:  T Wu; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; S J Riederer; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison between diffusion-weighted imaging, T2-weighted, and postcontrast T1-weighted imaging after MR-guided, high intensity, focused ultrasound treatment of uterine leiomyomata: preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; David H Gultekin; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Potential adverse effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure on blood vessels in vivo.

Authors:  K Hynynen; A H Chung; V Colucci; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Rapid high resolution MR neurography with a diffusion-weighted pre-pulse.

Authors:  Masami Yoneyama; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Masanobu Nakamura; Takashi Tabuchi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Laser therapy for breast cancer: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  H Mumtaz; M A Hall-Craggs; A Wotherspoon; M Paley; G Buonaccorsi; Z Amin; I Wilkinson; M W Kissin; T I Davidson; I Taylor; S G Bown
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Stability and trapping of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents during high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation therapy.

Authors:  Nicole M Hijnen; Aaldert Elevelt; Holger Grüll
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Prostate tissue analysis immediately following magnetic resonance imaging guided transurethral ultrasound thermal therapy.

Authors:  Aaron Boyes; Kee Tang; Martin Yaffe; Linda Sugar; Rajiv Chopra; Michael Bronskill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Imaging findings in MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with essential tremor.

Authors:  M Wintermark; J Druzgal; D S Huss; M A Khaled; S Monteith; P Raghavan; T Huerta; L C Schweickert; B Burkholder; J J Loomba; E Zadicario; Y Qiao; B Shah; J Snell; M Eames; R Frysinger; N Kassell; W J Elias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging for Monitoring the Instantly Therapeutic Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in Rabbit VX2 Tumors without Evident Links between Conventional Perfusion Weighted Images.

Authors:  Ziyi Guo; Qiang Zhang; Xiaoguang Li; Zhengyu Jing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Non-Invasive Targeted Peripheral Nerve Ablation Using 3D MR Neurography and MRI-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU): Pilot Study in a Swine Model.

Authors:  Merel Huisman; Robert M Staruch; Michelle Ladouceur-Wodzak; Maurice A van den Bosch; Dennis K Burns; Avneesh Chhabra; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of prostate cancer with hyperpolarized 13 C dual-agent imaging of metabolism and perfusion.

Authors:  Jessie E Lee; Chris J Diederich; Robert Bok; Renuka Sriram; Romelyn Delos Santos; Susan M Noworolski; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Matthew S Adams; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.

Authors:  Brett Z Fite; James Wang; Pejman Ghanouni; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  BME Front       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring tissue change during magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in bone applications: an ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Sharon L Giles; Jessica M Winfield; David J Collins; Ian Rivens; John Civale; Gail R Ter Haar; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-05-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.