PURPOSE: There is a need for methods which enable precise correlation of histologic sections with in vivo prostate images. Such methods would allow direct comparison between imaging features and functional or histopathological heterogeneity of tumors. Correlation would be particularly useful for validating the accuracy of imaging modalities, developing imaging techniques, assessing image-guided therapy, etc. An optimum prostate slicing method for accurate correlation between the histopathological and medical imaging planes in terms of section angle, thickness and level was sought. METHODS: Literature review (51 references from 1986-2009 were cited) was done on the various sectioning apparatus or techniques used to slice the prostate specimen for accurate correlation between histopathological data and medical imaging. Technology evaluation was performed with review and discussion of various methods used to section other organs and their possible applications for sectioning prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: No consensus has been achieved on how the prostate should be dissected to achieve a good correlation. Various customized sectioning instruments and techniques working with different mechanism are used in different research institutes to improve the correlation. Some of the methods have convincingly shown significant potential for improving image-specimen correlation. However, the semisolid consistent property of prostate tissue and the lack of identifiable landmarks remain challenges to be overcome, especially for fresh prostate sectioning and microtomy without external fiducials. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized optimum protocol to dissect prostatectomy specimens is needed for the validation of medical imaging modalities by histologic correlation. These standards can enhance disease management by improving the comparability between different modalities.
PURPOSE: There is a need for methods which enable precise correlation of histologic sections with in vivo prostate images. Such methods would allow direct comparison between imaging features and functional or histopathological heterogeneity of tumors. Correlation would be particularly useful for validating the accuracy of imaging modalities, developing imaging techniques, assessing image-guided therapy, etc. An optimum prostate slicing method for accurate correlation between the histopathological and medical imaging planes in terms of section angle, thickness and level was sought. METHODS: Literature review (51 references from 1986-2009 were cited) was done on the various sectioning apparatus or techniques used to slice the prostate specimen for accurate correlation between histopathological data and medical imaging. Technology evaluation was performed with review and discussion of various methods used to section other organs and their possible applications for sectioning prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: No consensus has been achieved on how the prostate should be dissected to achieve a good correlation. Various customized sectioning instruments and techniques working with different mechanism are used in different research institutes to improve the correlation. Some of the methods have convincingly shown significant potential for improving image-specimen correlation. However, the semisolid consistent property of prostate tissue and the lack of identifiable landmarks remain challenges to be overcome, especially for fresh prostate sectioning and microtomy without external fiducials. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized optimum protocol to dissect prostatectomy specimens is needed for the validation of medical imaging modalities by histologic correlation. These standards can enhance disease management by improving the comparability between different modalities.
Authors: Olivier Rouvière; Carol Reynolds; Thomas Hulshizer; Phillip Rossman; Yuan Le; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Darko Pucar; Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Semra Olgac; Lanie E Ebora; Peter T Scardino; Jason A Koutcher; Kristen L Zakian Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-06-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael S Breen; Roee S Lazebnik; Maryann Fitzmaurice; Sherif G Nour; Jonathan S Lewin; David L Wilson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Junqian Xu; Peter A Humphrey; Adam S Kibel; Abraham Z Snyder; Vamsidhar R Narra; Joseph J H Ackerman; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: N Van As; E Charles-Edwards; A Jackson; S Jhavar; S Reinsberg; N Desouza; D Dearnaley; M Bailey; A Thompson; T Christmas; C Fisher; C Corbishley; S Sohaib Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Alan Priester; Shyam Natarajan; Jesse D Le; James Garritano; Bryan Radosavcev; Warren Grundfest; Daniel Ja Margolis; Leonard S Marks; Jiaoti Huang Journal: Am J Clin Exp Urol Date: 2014-07-12
Authors: Lisanne L de Boer; Jarich W Spliethoff; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Theo J M Ruers Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Clement Orczyk; Artem Mikheev; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Jonathan Melamed; Samir S Taneja; Henry Rusinek Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2012-02-23
Authors: Alan Priester; Shyam Natarajan; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Daniel J Margolis; Steven S Raman; Robert E Reiter; Jiaoti Huang; Warren Grundfest; Leonard S Marks Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Hari Trivedi; Baris Turkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Compton J Benjamin; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Vijay Shah; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; W Marston Linehan; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto Journal: Urology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Alan Priester; Holden Wu; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Douglas Schneider; Zhaohuan Zhang; Nazanin H Asvadi; Anthony Sisk; Steven Raman; Robert Reiter; Warren Grundfest; Leonard S Marks; Shyam Natarajan Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Eli Gibson; Mena Gaed; José A Gómez; Madeleine Moussa; Stephen Pautler; Joseph L Chin; Cathie Crukley; Glenn S Bauman; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2013-10-31
Authors: Rogier R Wildeboer; Ruud J G van Sloun; Arnoud W Postema; Christophe K Mannaerts; Maudy Gayet; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2018-07-30