Literature DB >> 10401085

Visual Displays and Visual Perception in Minimal Access Surgery.

.   

Abstract

Visual perceptual processing underlies safe execution of endoscopic surgery. This review deals with the limitations of the present visual display technology used in endoscopic surgery with reference to the normal direct stereoscopic vision and pints to the research and development needed in this important technological and psychomotor aspect of endoscopic surgery. Eyeball movements (saccadic and smooth pursuit), visual cues (stereoscopic and monoscopic), accommodation, individual visual attributes, and the display technology itself are all important. Monocular depth cues are degraded by the cureent display systems, and technological advances in this are will improve perceptual processing and reduce both fatigue and human error during endoscopic interventions. Depth perception can be improved by alternative techniques to three-dimensional imaging such as the VISTRAL system and the Suspended Image System based on projection of image by parabolic mirrors and advanced beam spitter technology.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 10401085     DOI: 10.1053/SLAS00200209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg        ISSN: 1071-5517


  15 in total

1.  Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  B Zheng; Z Janmohamed; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Characterizing the "gold standard" image for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S I Brown; C White; K Wipat; G B Hanna; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Commentary. Regarding the article "three dimensional view in endoscopic surgery" by N. Ishikawa et al.

Authors:  G Berci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Erwin Rieder; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Gyusung Lee; O Neely M Panton; Adrian Park; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xianta Jiang; Geoffrey Tien; Adam Meneghetti; O Neely M Panton; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators.

Authors:  B Zheng; F Verjee; A Lomax; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.

Authors:  B Zheng; L L Swanström; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Authors:  Noemi Bitterman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G El Shallaly; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Epistemology of visual imaging in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.