Literature DB >> 30374849

The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS.

Majid Assadi1, Erik Velez2, Mohammad Hosein Najafi3, Ali Gholamrezanezhad4.   

Abstract

Newer structured reporting manners, the reporting and data system (RADS), have made vast steps in improving standardized and structured reporting, allowing better communication between radiologists and referring providers. This has been implemented in several fields: breast (BI-RADS), lung (Lung-RADS), liver (LI-RADS), thyroid (TI-RADS), prostate (PI-RADS), and in cardiovascular radiology (CAD-RADS). The field of nuclear cardiology began its efforts of standardization years ago; however, a widespread standardized reporting structure has not yet been adopted. Such an approach in nuclear cardiology, the nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS), will assist radiologists and treating clinicians in conveying and understanding reports and determining the appropriate next steps in management. By linking explicit findings to defined recommendations, patients will receive more consistent and appropriate care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nuclear cardiology; SPECT; decision making; diagnosis; dictation; imaging reporting and data systems; interpretation; myocardial perfusion; report; scintigraphy; standardization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374849     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01473-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  36 in total

1.  Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?

Authors:  Ramin Khorasani; David W Bates; Susan Teeger; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Douglas F Adams; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Sachin H Jain; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  ACR CT Accreditation Program and the Lung Cancer Screening Program Designation.

Authors:  Ella A Kazerooni; Mark R Armstrong; Judith K Amorosa; Dina Hernandez; Lawrence A Liebscher; Hrudaya Nath; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Eric J Stern; Pamela A Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  [Structure and content of the radiological report: an audit of 94 reports from a university education center].

Authors:  J M L Bosmans; J W M Van Goethem; A M De Schepper
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

5.  Six characteristics of effective structured reporting and the inevitable integration with speech recognition.

Authors:  David Liu; Mark Zucherman; William B Tulloss
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.

Authors:  Jan M L Bosmans; Joost J Weyler; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.

Authors:  Ajay Aroor Rao; Jennifer Feneis; Chloe Lalonde; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree.

Authors:  C J D'Orsi; D B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Sooah Kim; Ruth P Lim; Nicole Hindman; Fang-Ming Deng; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) imaging reporting and data system (COVID-RADS) and common lexicon: a proposal based on the imaging data of 37 studies.

Authors:  Sana Salehi; Aidin Abedi; Sudheer Balakrishnan; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia incidentally detected on coronary CT angiogram: a do-not-miss diagnosis.

Authors:  Shima Behzad; Erik Velez; Mohammad Hosein Najafi; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 3.  [Current developments on digitalization : Analysis of quality and economics in healthcare].

Authors:  H Dick; S Doth; C Ernst; S Fischer; M Holderried
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.