Literature DB >> 12796579

Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer.

David A Kooby1, Arief Suriawinata, David S Klimstra, Murray F Brennan, Martin S Karpeh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors predictive of survival following curative resection for node-negative gastric adenocarcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Presence or absence of lymph node metastases is the most powerful predictor of survival following curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Factors predictive of survival in node-negative gastric cancer have not been clarified.
METHODS: Histopathology and clinical outcome for all patients undergoing R0 resections for gastric adenocarcinoma at a tertiary center between 1985 and 2001 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of 1,256 R0 resections performed, 507 (40%) were node-negative, 465 were T1-T3, and 317 of these were adequately staged, as defined by histologic evaluation of at least 15 lymph nodes. Median age was 67 years, and 62% were male. Forty percent had T1 tumors, 34% were T2, and 26% were T3. Median tumor size was 3 cm. Vascular invasion (VI) was present in 17% of tumors and neural invasion (NI) in 31%. Extended (D2) lymphadenectomy was performed in 75% of cases. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 79% and 67% respectively. Factors associated with poorer disease-specific survival on univariate analysis were male gender, serosal invasion, presence of VI, presence of NI, and resection other than distal subtotal gastrectomy. On multivariate analysis, NI was not an independent predictor of survival, but correlated directly with advancing T stage and tumor size.
CONCLUSIONS: Serosal invasion and presence of VI are strong predictors of poor survival in this disease. NI correlates with T stage and tumor size and may serve as a marker of advanced disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796579      PMCID: PMC1514693          DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072260.77776.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  34 in total

1.  Identifying patients with T3-T4 node-negative colon cancer at high risk of recurrence.

Authors:  G Burdy; Y Panis; A Alves; J Nemeth; A Lavergne-Slove; P Valleur
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Outcome of prophylactic radical lymphadenectomy with gastrectomy in patients with early gastric carcinoma without lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  E Otsuji; A Toma; S Kobayashi; K Okamoto; A Hagiwara; H Yamagishi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Perineural invasion and MIB-1 positivity in addition to Gleason score are significant preoperative predictors of progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Sebo; John C Cheville; Darren L Riehle; Christine M Lohse; V Shane Pankratz; Robert P Myers; Michael L Blute; Horst Zincke
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ichiro Hirai; Wataru Kimura; Koichiro Ozawa; Shun Kudo; Koichi Suto; Hiroshi Kuzu; Akira Fuse
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Factors associated with local breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy alone: postmenopausal patients.

Authors:  D R McCready; J A Chapman; W M Hanna; H J Kahn; K Yap; E B Fish; H L Lickley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Leyo Ruo; Satish Tickoo; David S Klimstra; Bruce D Minsky; Leonard Saltz; Madhu Mazumdar; Philip B Paty; W Douglas Wong; Steven M Larson; Alfred M Cohen; Jose G Guillem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prognostic impact of lymphatic and/or blood vessel invasion in patients with node-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Woo Jin Hyung; Jun Ho Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Jin Sik Min; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value.

Authors:  E Klein Kranenbarg; J Hermans; J H van Krieken; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  40 in total

1.  Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; Miklós Török; Zsolt Kincses; László Damjanovich
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of gastric cancer in the young adult in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Hui-yan Luo; Zhi-wei Zhou; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Wen-qi Jiang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-12-23

3.  Prognostic analysis in node-negative gastric cancer patients in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Hui-yan Luo; Dong-sheng Zhang; Zhi-wei Zhou; Yu-hong Li; Wen-qi Jiang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-12-22

4.  Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a review.

Authors:  James M McLoughlin
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2004-10

5.  Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer: an application of gene-expression and tissue array techniques.

Authors:  Bryan J Dicken; Kathryn Graham; Stewart M Hamilton; Sam Andrews; Raymond Lai; Jennifer Listgarten; Gian S Jhangri; L Duncan Saunders; Sambasivarao Damaraju; Carol Cass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with node-negative metastasis following curative resection: outcomes of the survival and recurrence.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Han Liang; Dan Sun; Rupeng Zhang; Hongjie Zhan; Xiaona Wang
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; János Plósz; Miklós Török
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

8.  Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniele Marrelli; Alfonso De Stefano; Giovanni de Manzoni; Paolo Morgagni; Alberto Di Leo; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Risk factors for lymphatic and venous involvement in endoscopically resected gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masau Sekiguchi; Shigeki Sekine; Ichiro Oda; Satoru Nonaka; Haruhisa Suzuki; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Hitoshi Tsuda; Ryoji Kushima; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  False-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takao Ohtsuka; Seiji Sato; Yoshihiko Kitajima; Masayuki Tanaka; Yuji Nakafusa; Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.