Literature DB >> 11139315

Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value.

E Klein Kranenbarg1, J Hermans, J H van Krieken, C J van de Velde.   

Abstract

The main change in the 5th edition (1997) of the TNM classification for gastric cancer compared to the 4th edition (1987) is the use of the number of involved nodes instead of the location of positive nodes. As a result stage grouping is also altered. A second change is the requirement for the examination of at least 15 nodes to justify the N0 status. Patients with fewer examined negative nodes are unclassifiable (Nx). Data were retrieved from a randomized trial database comparing D1 and D2 dissection and 633 curatively operated patients were included. According to the criteria of the 5th edition, 39% of the node-positive patients had another N stage compared to the 4th: 21% had a lower and 18% had a higher stage. 5-year survival rates according to the 4th edition N0, N1 and N2 groups were respectively 72%, 34% and 27%. According to the 5th edition these percentages were for the N0, N1, N2, N3 and Nx groups respectively 75%, 38%, 19%, 8% and 65%. The former 1987 N1 and N2 group were significantly split into three new N 1997 groups (P = 0.006, respectively P< 0.0005). The Cox's regression analysis showed the N 1997 classification to be the most important prognostic variable, with a higher prognostic value than N 1987. In addition, the new TNM stage was also a better prognosticator. The requirement for examining at least 15 nodes, however, could not be fulfilled in 38% of all node-negative patients and we found that a minimum of 5 consecutive negative lymph nodes is a reliable number for staging purposes. We conclude that the 5th edition of the TNM classification provides a better estimation of prognosis, however, examination of at least 15 negative regional lymph nodes is too high a threshold and 5 gives similar prognostic value. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139315      PMCID: PMC2363617          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  30 in total

1.  The new Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: Points to be revised.

Authors:  Takashi Aiko; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Metastatic gastric lymph node rate is a significant prognostic factor for resectable stage IV stomach cancer.

Authors:  Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  J D Roder; K Böttcher; R Busch; C Wittekind; P Hermanek; J R Siewert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.

Authors:  K Fujii; H Isozaki; K Okajima; E Nomura; M Niki; S Sako; N Izumi; H Mabuchi; K Nishiguchi; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Caplin; J P Cerottini; F T Bosman; M T Constanda; J C Givel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group.

Authors:  J R Siewert; K Böttcher; J D Roder; R Busch; P Hermanek; H J Meyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification.

Authors:  Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  [Oncologic surgery/pathologic-anatomic viewpoint].

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd       Date:  1991

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  Transcription factor Sp1 expression in gastric cancer and its relationship to long-term prognosis.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Zheng-Gang Zhu; Jun Ji; Fei Yuan; Ying-Yan Yu; Bing-Ya Liu; Yan-Zhen Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.

Authors:  Sumin Chae; Anbok Lee; Joo-Ho Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Active Stat3 and Her-2 as combined survival predictors show superiority to TNM staging system for postoperative patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ke Sun; Meng Qing Xu; Hai Jun Zhang; Dan Dan Zhang; Wen Yue; Miao Miao Ma; Lin Tao; Wen Jie Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Prognosis of pN3 stage gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jung Ryun Ahn; Minkyu Jung; Chan Kim; Min Hee Hong; Hong Jae Chon; Hye Ryun Kim; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Sook Lee; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sung Hoon Noh; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Rationale for gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alvaro Díaz de Liaño; Concepción Yarnoz; Rubén Aguilar; Cristina Artieda; Héctor Ortiz
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer.

Authors:  David A Kooby; Arief Suriawinata; David S Klimstra; Murray F Brennan; Martin S Karpeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Oncogenic pathway combinations predict clinical prognosis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chia Huey Ooi; Tatiana Ivanova; Jeanie Wu; Minghui Lee; Iain Beehuat Tan; Jiong Tao; Lindsay Ward; Jun Hao Koo; Veena Gopalakrishnan; Yansong Zhu; Lai Ling Cheng; Julian Lee; Sun Young Rha; Hyun Cheol Chung; Kumaresan Ganesan; Jimmy So; Khee Chee Soo; Dennis Lim; Weng Hoong Chan; Wai Keong Wong; David Bowtell; Khay Guan Yeoh; Heike Grabsch; Alex Boussioutas; Patrick Tan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Gross genomic damage measured by DNA image cytometry independently predicts gastric cancer patient survival.

Authors:  J A M Belien; T E Buffart; A J Gill; M A M Broeckaert; P Quirke; G A Meijer; H I Grabsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Mining novel biomarkers for prognosis of gastric cancer with serum proteomics.

Authors:  Fu-Ming Qiu; Jie-Kai Yu; Yi-Ding Chen; Qi-Feng Jin; Mei-Hua Sui; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-09

10.  Gastric cancer staging with dual energy spectral CT imaging.

Authors:  Zilai Pan; Lifang Pang; Bei Ding; Chao Yan; Huan Zhang; Lianjun Du; Baisong Wang; Qi Song; Kemin Chen; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.