Literature DB >> 12794571

Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.

Mart-Jan G M Rongen1, Ozenç Uludag, Kadri El Naggar, Bas P Geerdes, Joop Konsten, Cor G M I Baeten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Graciloplasty has been used as a treatment for end-stage fecal incontinence since 1946. Electric stimulation with an implantable pulse generator has existed for 15 years. The gracilis muscle is wrapped around the anal canal and stimulated by intramuscular electrodes connected with an implantable pulse generator. Initial reports have been promising, but long-term results have not been presented to date.
METHODS: Data of 200 consecutive patients with a follow-up of at least two years were analyzed in a prospective manner from 1986 until 1999.
RESULTS: The overall success rate was 72 percent. In patients with fecal incontinence caused by trauma, the rate was 82 percent. Once continent, patients remained continent after a median follow-up of 261 (standard deviation, 132) weeks. Median survival of the implantable pulse generator until battery expiration was 405 weeks. Disturbed evacuation remained a problem in 16 percent of all patients. Complications were frequent but treatable.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic graciloplasty is a good, cost-effective treatment for fecal incontinence with results lasting for a median of more than five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12794571     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6645-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

Review 1.  Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Maslekar; A Gardiner; C Maklin; G S Duthie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Christophe Müller; Orlin Belyaev; Thomas Deska; Ansgar Chromik; Dirk Weyhe; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Neurostimulated levator augmentation--a new approach in restoring continence.

Authors:  Christoph Isbert; Nicolas Schlegel; Joachim Reibetanz; Katica Krajinovic; Karsten Schmidt; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Muscle transposition: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Susan M Cera; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

Review 8.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  [Fecal incontinence].

Authors:  J Braun; S Willis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Peña Ros; P A Parra Baños; J A Benavides Buleje; J M Muñoz Camarena; C Escamilla Segade; M F Candel Arenas; F M Gonzalez Valverde; A Albarracín Marín-Blázquez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.